PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITC.DE vs. AHYQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BITC.DE vs. AHYQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in CoinShares Physical Bitcoin (BTC) EUR ETP (BITC.DE) and Amundi MSCI World III UCITS ETF Dist (AHYQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITC.DE achieves a -26.37% return, which is significantly lower than AHYQ.DE's 10.93% return.


BITC.DE

1D
-3.77%
1M
-21.21%
YTD
-26.37%
6M
-31.04%
1Y
-40.65%
3Y*
30.09%
5Y*
10Y*

AHYQ.DE

1D
-0.03%
1M
4.91%
YTD
10.93%
6M
11.19%
1Y
23.74%
3Y*
17.53%
5Y*
12.23%
10Y*
11.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITC.DE vs. AHYQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BITC.DE
CoinShares Physical Bitcoin (BTC) EUR ETP
-26.37%-16.94%129.58%149.42%-63.64%41.07%
AHYQ.DE
Amundi MSCI World III UCITS ETF Dist
10.93%7.92%25.91%20.09%-15.16%16.12%

Correlation

The correlation between BITC.DE and AHYQ.DE is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2021

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BITC.DE vs. AHYQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITC.DE
BITC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BITC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BITC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

AHYQ.DE
AHYQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
AHYQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AHYQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
AHYQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
AHYQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
AHYQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITC.DE vs. AHYQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Bitcoin (BTC) EUR ETP (BITC.DE) and Amundi MSCI World III UCITS ETF Dist (AHYQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BITC.DEAHYQ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.39

-0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.82

3.58

-4.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.44

14.39

-15.83

BITC.DE vs. AHYQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITC.DE Sharpe Ratio is -1.00, which is lower than the AHYQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITC.DE and AHYQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BITC.DEAHYQ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.00

2.09

-3.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.81

-0.58

Drawdowns

BITC.DE vs. AHYQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITC.DE drawdown since its inception was -74.39%, which is greater than AHYQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITC.DE and AHYQ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BITC.DEAHYQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.39%

-33.70%

-40.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.43%

-6.60%

-42.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.43%

-21.77%

-27.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.65%

-0.37%

-48.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.19%

-4.49%

-27.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.17%

1.65%

+26.52%

Volatility

BITC.DE vs. AHYQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

CoinShares Physical Bitcoin (BTC) EUR ETP (BITC.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.92% compared to Amundi MSCI World III UCITS ETF Dist (AHYQ.DE) at 2.64%. This indicates that BITC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AHYQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BITC.DEAHYQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.92%

2.64%

+7.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.32%

7.77%

+23.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.71%

11.28%

+29.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.73%

14.33%

+38.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.73%

15.29%

+37.44%

BITC.DE vs. AHYQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITC.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than AHYQ.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BITC.DE vs. AHYQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

BITC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AHYQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%.


PositionTTM202520242023
AHYQ.DE
Amundi MSCI World III UCITS ETF Dist
1.06%1.18%1.65%1.78%
BITC.DE
CoinShares Physical Bitcoin (BTC) EUR ETP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BITC.DE and AHYQ.DE have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AHYQ.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AHYQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for BITC.DE.

BITC.DE is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while AHYQ.DE is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: CoinShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for BITC.DE and 0.20% for AHYQ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BITC.DE and AHYQ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer