Correlation
The correlation between AHYQ.DE and H410.DE is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
AHYQ.DE vs. H410.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi MSCI World III UCITS ETF Dist (AHYQ.DE) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (H410.DE).
AHYQ.DE and H410.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AHYQ.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI World. It was launched on Apr 21, 2023. H410.DE is a passively managed fund by HSBC that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets. It was launched on Sep 5, 2011. Both AHYQ.DE and H410.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AHYQ.DE or H410.DE.
Performance
AHYQ.DE vs. H410.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
AHYQ.DE:
0.50
H410.DE:
0.29
AHYQ.DE:
0.80
H410.DE:
0.66
AHYQ.DE:
1.12
H410.DE:
1.09
AHYQ.DE:
0.44
H410.DE:
0.37
AHYQ.DE:
1.52
H410.DE:
1.33
AHYQ.DE:
6.26%
H410.DE:
5.36%
AHYQ.DE:
17.84%
H410.DE:
17.57%
AHYQ.DE:
-33.70%
H410.DE:
-36.25%
AHYQ.DE:
-8.63%
H410.DE:
-7.43%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AHYQ.DE achieves a -3.92% return, which is significantly lower than H410.DE's -0.82% return. Over the past 10 years, AHYQ.DE has outperformed H410.DE with an annualized return of 8.89%, while H410.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 3.36% annualized return.
AHYQ.DE
-3.92%
6.54%
-5.12%
9.51%
10.50%
12.97%
8.89%
H410.DE
-0.82%
4.09%
-0.78%
7.14%
2.77%
6.36%
3.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AHYQ.DE vs. H410.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AHYQ.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than H410.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AHYQ.DE vs. H410.DE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
AHYQ.DE
H410.DE
AHYQ.DE vs. H410.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI World III UCITS ETF Dist (AHYQ.DE) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (H410.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
AHYQ.DE vs. H410.DE - Dividend Comparison
AHYQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than H410.DE's 2.48% yield.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AHYQ.DE Amundi MSCI World III UCITS ETF Dist | 1.72% | 1.65% | 1.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
H410.DE HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD | 2.48% | 2.40% | 2.58% | 3.11% | 2.00% | 1.69% | 2.03% | 2.20% | 1.62% | 1.71% | 2.28% | 1.88% |
Drawdowns
AHYQ.DE vs. H410.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AHYQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.70%, smaller than the maximum H410.DE drawdown of -36.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHYQ.DE and H410.DE.
Loading data...
Volatility
AHYQ.DE vs. H410.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi MSCI World III UCITS ETF Dist (AHYQ.DE) is 5.01%, while HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (H410.DE) has a volatility of 5.43%. This indicates that AHYQ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than H410.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...