BITB vs. CSHP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BITB (Bitwise Bitcoin ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BITB is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. BITB is passively managed, while CSHP is actively managed. Over the past year, BITB returned -38.62% vs 3.96% for CSHP. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.

Performance

BITB vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITB achieves a -25.38% return, which is significantly lower than CSHP's 1.63% return.

BITB

• 1D: -2.74%
• 1M: -18.38%
• YTD: -25.38%
• 6M: -29.75%
• 1Y: -38.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSHP

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.63%
• 6M: 1.93%
• 1Y: 3.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITB vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BITB Bitwise Bitcoin ETF	-25.38%	-6.47%	46.71%
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	1.63%	4.10%	2.24%

Correlation

The correlation between BITB and CSHP is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2024	0.09

The correlation between BITB and CSHP shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BITB vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITB

BITB Risk / Return Rank: 2
BITB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BITB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BITB Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BITB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BITB Martin Ratio Rank: 2

CSHP

CSHP Risk / Return Rank: 100
CSHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Omega Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITB vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BITB	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.89	11.91	-12.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.22	31.26	-32.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	7.44	-6.57
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.78	65.71	-66.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.36	432.16	-433.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BITB vs. CSHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITB Sharpe Ratio is -0.89, which is lower than the CSHP Sharpe Ratio of 11.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITB and CSHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BITB	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.89	11.91	-12.80
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	10.75	-10.46

Drawdowns

BITB vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITB drawdown since its inception was -49.38%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITB and CSHP.

Drawdown Indicators

	BITB	CSHP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.38%	-0.08%	-49.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-49.38%	-0.06%	-49.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.02%	0.00%	-48.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.02%	-0.00%	-16.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.42%	0.01%	+28.41%

Volatility

BITB vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison

Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB) has a higher volatility of 9.39% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.07%. This indicates that BITB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BITB	CSHP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.39%	0.07%	+9.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.39%	0.24%	+34.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.62%	0.33%	+43.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.98%	0.40%	+49.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.98%	0.40%	+49.58%

BITB vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BITB and CSHP have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BITB vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison

BITB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CSHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BITB Bitwise Bitcoin ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	3.92%	5.39%	1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BITB and CSHP in my portfolio?

BITB and CSHP have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BITB or CSHP?

BITB has higher volatility (9.39%) compared to CSHP (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITB dropped -49.38% vs CSHP's -0.08%.

Which ETF is better, BITB or CSHP?

On 1-year performance, CSHP leads with 3.96% vs -38.62% for BITB. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BITB or CSHP?

Over the 1-year period, CSHP has performed better with a 3.96% return vs -38.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BITB or CSHP?

BITB and CSHP have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BITB or CSHP?

CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.92%, compared with 0.00% for BITB.

What is the main difference between BITB and CSHP?

BITB is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Bitwise Asset Management and iShares.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.91 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.