BITB vs. BTCZ
BITB (Bitwise Bitcoin ETF) and BTCZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. BITB is passively managed, while BTCZ is actively managed. Over the past year, BITB returned -44.51% vs 86.21% for BTCZ. Their -1.00 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BITB charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BTCZ.
Performance
BITB vs. BTCZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BITB achieves a -28.24% return, which is significantly lower than BTCZ's 34.44% return.
BITB
- 1D
- -2.87%
- 1M
- 2.34%
- 6M
- -25.01%
- YTD
- -28.24%
- 1Y
- -44.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.94%
BTCZ
- 1D
- 5.99%
- 1M
- -6.29%
- 6M
- 28.34%
- YTD
- 34.44%
- 1Y
- 86.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -51.65%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $37.99M | $39.08M | $56.07M | |
| $105.31M | $113.00M | $118.94M |
BITB vs. BTCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BITB Bitwise Bitcoin ETF | -28.24% | -6.47% | 61.12% |
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 34.44% | -29.11% | -76.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between BITB and BTCZ is -1.00, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2024 | -1.00 |
The correlation between BITB and BTCZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -1.00 to -1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BITB vs. BTCZ — Risk / Return Rank
BITB
BTCZ
BITB vs. BTCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BITB | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.22 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | 2.01 | -2.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.34 | 4.36 | -5.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BITB vs. BTCZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BITB drawdown since its inception was -53.33%, smaller than the maximum BTCZ drawdown of -91.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITB and BTCZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BITB | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.33% | -91.06% | +37.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.33% | -49.02% | -4.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.01% | -78.32% | +28.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.25% | -73.91% | +55.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.64% | 22.54% | +12.10% |
Volatility
BITB vs. BTCZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB) is 9.04%, while T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ) has a volatility of 18.19%. This indicates that BITB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BITB | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.04% | 18.19% | -9.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.71% | 67.20% | -33.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.37% | 89.06% | -44.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.38% | 95.65% | -46.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.38% | 95.65% | -46.27% |
BITB vs. BTCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BITB has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCZ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
BITB vs. BTCZ - Dividend Comparison
BITB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BITB Bitwise Bitcoin ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BITB and BTCZ have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTCZ has higher volatility (18.19%) compared to BITB (9.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITB dropped -53.33% vs BTCZ's -91.06%.
On 1-year performance, BTCZ leads with 86.21% vs -44.51% for BITB. On fees, BITB is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, BITB has been the lower-risk option at 9.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BTCZ has performed better with a 86.21% return vs -44.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BITB is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BTCZ.
BTCZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for BITB.
They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for BITB and 0.95% for BTCZ.
BTCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BITB and BTCZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer