BITB vs. ARKY
BITB (Bitwise Bitcoin ETF) and ARKY (ARK 21Shares Active Bitcoin Ethereum Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. BITB is passively managed, while ARKY is actively managed. BITB charges 0.20%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for ARKY.
Performance
BITB vs. ARKY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BITB
- 1D
- -2.74%
- 1M
- -18.38%
- YTD
- -25.38%
- 6M
- -29.75%
- 1Y
- -38.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARKY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITB vs. ARKY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BITB Bitwise Bitcoin ETF | -6.70% |
ARKY ARK 21Shares Active Bitcoin Ethereum Strategy ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BITB vs. ARKY — Risk / Return Rank
BITB
ARKY
BITB vs. ARKY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB) and ARK 21Shares Active Bitcoin Ethereum Strategy ETF (ARKY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BITB | ARKY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BITB | ARKY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | — | — |
Drawdowns
BITB vs. ARKY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BITB drawdown since its inception was -49.38%, which is greater than ARKY's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITB and ARKY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BITB | ARKY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.38% | 0.00% | -49.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.02% | 0.00% | -48.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.02% | 0.00% | -16.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.42% | — | — |
Volatility
BITB vs. ARKY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BITB | ARKY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.39% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.39% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.62% | 0.00% | +43.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.98% | 0.00% | +49.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.98% | 0.00% | +49.98% |
BITB vs. ARKY - Expense Ratio Comparison
BITB has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKY's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
BITB vs. ARKY - Dividend Comparison
Neither BITB nor ARKY has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, BITB is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BITB is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for ARKY.
BITB and ARKY have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Bitwise Asset Management and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for BITB and 1.00% for ARKY.
Find the right allocation for BITB and ARKY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer