BISMX vs. YASLX
Compare and contrast key facts about Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class I (BISMX) and AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund (YASLX).
BISMX is an actively managed fund by Brandes. It was launched on Feb 1, 2012. YASLX is managed by AMG. It was launched on Jun 29, 2014.
Performance
BISMX vs. YASLX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BISMX vs. YASLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BISMX Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class I | 0.80% | 45.81% | 23.44% | 39.27% | -8.48% | 18.58% | 4.85% | 7.16% | -20.04% | 11.79% |
YASLX AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund | 9.59% | 6.27% | 11.23% | 3.65% | -13.59% | 24.45% | 12.82% | 17.07% | -10.15% | 34.85% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BISMX achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly lower than YASLX's 9.59% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BISMX having a 11.16% annualized return and YASLX not far behind at 10.88%.
BISMX
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- -2.83%
- YTD
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 4.16%
- 1Y
- 32.59%
- 3Y*
- 30.53%
- 5Y*
- 19.30%
- 10Y*
- 11.16%
YASLX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- YTD
- 9.59%
- 6M
- 3.93%
- 1Y
- 15.10%
- 3Y*
- 10.42%
- 5Y*
- 4.82%
- 10Y*
- 10.88%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BISMX vs. YASLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BISMX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is lower than YASLX's 1.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BISMX vs. YASLX — Risk / Return Rank
BISMX
YASLX
BISMX vs. YASLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class I (BISMX) and AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund (YASLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BISMX | YASLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.42 | 1.25 | +1.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.12 | 1.63 | +1.49 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.25 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 1.57 | +1.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.18 | 4.22 | +6.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BISMX | YASLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | 1.25 | +1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.41 | 0.30 | +1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | 0.73 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.58 | +0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between BISMX and YASLX is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BISMX vs. YASLX - Dividend Comparison
BISMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, while YASLX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BISMX Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class I | 3.31% | 3.34% | 3.22% | 2.93% | 4.16% | 3.45% | 0.92% | 0.82% | 4.10% | 8.51% | 4.16% | 3.65% |
YASLX AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 15.82% | 8.97% | 0.94% | 3.85% | 2.62% | 12.95% | 9.89% | 4.86% | 3.28% | 4.59% |
Drawdowns
BISMX vs. YASLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BISMX drawdown since its inception was -47.07%, which is greater than YASLX's maximum drawdown of -38.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BISMX and YASLX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BISMX | YASLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.07% | -38.91% | -8.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.61% | -10.18% | -1.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.26% | -27.74% | -3.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.07% | -38.91% | -8.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.52% | -3.10% | -4.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.95% | -8.33% | +0.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 3.79% | -0.84% |
Volatility
BISMX vs. YASLX - Volatility Comparison
Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class I (BISMX) has a higher volatility of 5.77% compared to AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund (YASLX) at 3.38%. This indicates that BISMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YASLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BISMX | YASLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.77% | 3.38% | +2.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.55% | 8.82% | +0.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.56% | 13.07% | +0.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.79% | 16.33% | -2.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.19% | 15.00% | -0.81% |