PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BISMX vs. FSTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BISMX vs. FSTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class I (BISMX) and Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund (FSTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BISMX achieves a 7.89% return, which is significantly higher than FSTSX's 6.82% return. Over the past 10 years, BISMX has outperformed FSTSX with an annualized return of 11.76%, while FSTSX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.96% annualized return.


BISMX

1D
0.69%
1M
7.53%
6M
2.61%
YTD
7.89%
1Y
13.57%
3Y*
28.49%
5Y*
19.20%
10Y*
11.76%
ALL TIME*
11.46%

FSTSX

1D
1.06%
1M
0.21%
6M
2.85%
YTD
6.82%
1Y
11.03%
3Y*
15.63%
5Y*
4.99%
10Y*
9.96%
ALL TIME*
9.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BISMX vs. FSTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BISMX
Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class I
7.89%45.81%23.44%39.27%-8.48%18.58%4.85%7.16%-20.04%11.79%
FSTSX
Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund
6.82%27.49%4.97%18.36%-26.25%18.29%19.61%28.24%-13.19%34.44%

Correlation

The correlation between BISMX and FSTSX is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2012

0.79

The correlation between BISMX and FSTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BISMX vs. FSTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BISMX
BISMX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
BISMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BISMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
BISMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
BISMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
BISMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

FSTSX
FSTSX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
FSTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BISMX vs. FSTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class I (BISMX) and Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund (FSTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BISMXFSTSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.16

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

1.09

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.84

3.49

-0.64

BISMX vs. FSTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BISMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is higher than the FSTSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BISMX and FSTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BISMX vs. FSTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BISMX drawdown since its inception was -47.07%, which is greater than FSTSX's maximum drawdown of -38.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BISMX and FSTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BISMXFSTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.07%

-38.91%

-8.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.61%

-11.22%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.61%

-12.48%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.26%

-38.91%

+7.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.07%

-38.91%

-8.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

-1.90%

+0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.92%

-7.84%

-0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.00%

3.50%

+1.50%

Volatility

BISMX vs. FSTSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class I (BISMX) is 3.13%, while Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund (FSTSX) has a volatility of 4.16%. This indicates that BISMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BISMXFSTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.13%

4.16%

-1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.75%

11.98%

-1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.92%

14.49%

-1.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.88%

16.51%

-2.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.11%

15.70%

-1.59%

BISMX vs. FSTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BISMX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than FSTSX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

BISMX vs. FSTSX - Dividend Comparison

BISMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, less than FSTSX's 14.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BISMX
Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class I
3.52%3.34%3.22%2.93%4.16%3.45%0.92%0.82%4.10%8.51%4.16%3.65%
FSTSX
Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund
14.26%15.24%10.22%3.34%6.38%13.22%0.81%4.27%10.99%6.30%4.01%7.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


BISMX and FSTSX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSTSX has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to BISMX (3.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BISMX dropped -47.07% vs FSTSX's -38.91%.

BISMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BISMX and FSTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer