PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BISAX vs. WCMSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BISAX vs. WCMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund (BISAX) and WCM International Small Cap Growth Fund (WCMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BISAX achieves a -1.31% return, which is significantly lower than WCMSX's 14.83% return. Over the past 10 years, BISAX has underperformed WCMSX with an annualized return of 10.57%, while WCMSX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.77% annualized return.


BISAX

1D
-0.46%
1M
-1.95%
YTD
-1.31%
6M
-0.61%
1Y
10.95%
3Y*
26.85%
5Y*
16.97%
10Y*
10.57%

WCMSX

1D
0.79%
1M
-0.92%
YTD
14.83%
6M
14.83%
1Y
15.34%
3Y*
14.28%
5Y*
1.53%
10Y*
12.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BISAX vs. WCMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BISAX
Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund
-1.31%45.50%23.18%39.03%-8.68%18.39%4.62%6.80%-20.13%11.52%
WCMSX
WCM International Small Cap Growth Fund
14.83%18.14%4.33%22.26%-42.12%16.65%55.36%45.02%-8.94%42.35%

Correlation

The correlation between BISAX and WCMSX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.70

The correlation between BISAX and WCMSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BISAX vs. WCMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BISAX
BISAX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
BISAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BISAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
BISAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
BISAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
BISAX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

WCMSX
WCMSX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
WCMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WCMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
WCMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
WCMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
WCMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BISAX vs. WCMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund (BISAX) and WCM International Small Cap Growth Fund (WCMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BISAXWCMSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.16

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

1.55

-0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.41

3.82

-1.41

BISAX vs. WCMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BISAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is comparable to the WCMSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BISAX and WCMSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BISAX vs. WCMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BISAX drawdown since its inception was -47.30%, smaller than the maximum WCMSX drawdown of -51.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BISAX and WCMSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BISAXWCMSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.30%

-51.60%

+4.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.63%

-9.81%

-1.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.63%

-19.37%

+7.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.44%

-51.60%

+20.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.30%

-51.60%

+4.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.45%

-7.12%

-2.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.04%

-15.74%

+7.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.33%

3.95%

+0.38%

Volatility

BISAX vs. WCMSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund (BISAX) is 3.52%, while WCM International Small Cap Growth Fund (WCMSX) has a volatility of 7.92%. This indicates that BISAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WCMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BISAXWCMSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.52%

7.92%

-4.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.36%

15.84%

-5.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.51%

18.41%

-5.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.91%

21.05%

-7.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.28%

20.14%

-5.86%

BISAX vs. WCMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BISAX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is higher than WCMSX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

BISAX vs. WCMSX - Dividend Comparison

BISAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than WCMSX's 0.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BISAX
Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund
3.27%3.23%3.06%2.81%3.87%3.46%0.81%0.66%3.88%8.33%4.00%3.44%
WCMSX
WCM International Small Cap Growth Fund
0.71%0.81%1.31%0.00%0.00%10.27%2.73%0.57%4.04%1.10%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BISAX and WCMSX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WCMSX has higher volatility (7.92%) compared to BISAX (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BISAX dropped -47.30% vs WCMSX's -51.60%.

BISAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BISAX and WCMSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer