BIOA vs. SIMO
BIOA (BioAge Labs, Inc) and SIMO (Silicon Motion Technology Corporation) are both stocks. BIOA operates in Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic (Healthcare), while SIMO operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past year, BIOA returned 119.42% vs 237.94% for SIMO. Their 0.17 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
BIOA vs. SIMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIOA achieves a -31.67% return, which is significantly lower than SIMO's 175.18% return.
BIOA
- 1D
- -63.62%
- 1M
- -63.98%
- 6M
- -52.40%
- YTD
- -31.67%
- 1Y
- 119.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -39.04%
SIMO
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -15.67%
- 6M
- 114.49%
- YTD
- 175.18%
- 1Y
- 237.94%
- 3Y*
- 62.86%
- 5Y*
- 30.34%
- 10Y*
- 19.94%
- ALL TIME*
- 18.18%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
BIOA BioAge Labs, Inc | $21.91M | $16.92M | $12.89M |
| $301.79M | $252.63M | $285.20M |
BIOA vs. SIMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BIOA BioAge Labs, Inc | -31.67% | 128.50% | -74.27% |
SIMO Silicon Motion Technology Corporation | 175.18% | 76.91% | -4.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between BIOA and SIMO is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2024 | 0.17 |
Fundamentals
BIOA:
$340.35M
SIMO:
$8.51B
BIOA:
-$2.36
SIMO:
$45.86
BIOA:
33.38
SIMO:
1.22
BIOA:
$10.32M
SIMO:
$1.31B
BIOA:
$7.48M
SIMO:
$641.93M
BIOA:
-$95.08M
SIMO:
$313.52M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BIOA vs. SIMO — Risk / Return Rank
BIOA
SIMO
BIOA vs. SIMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BioAge Labs, Inc (BIOA) and Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BIOA | SIMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.48 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 6.33 | -4.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.25 | 22.76 | -15.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BIOA vs. SIMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIOA drawdown since its inception was -88.23%, smaller than the maximum SIMO drawdown of -93.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIOA and SIMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIOA | SIMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.23% | -93.19% | +4.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.98% | -37.76% | -26.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -52.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -56.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.00% | -24.73% | -40.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.84% | -32.23% | -22.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.61% | 10.48% | +4.13% |
Volatility
BIOA vs. SIMO - Volatility Comparison
BioAge Labs, Inc (BIOA) has a higher volatility of 103.31% compared to Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) at 34.01%. This indicates that BIOA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BIOA | SIMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 103.31% | 34.01% | +69.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 113.94% | 65.64% | +48.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 106.51% | 79.31% | +27.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 108.89% | 52.55% | +56.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 108.89% | 46.67% | +62.22% |
Dividends
BIOA vs. SIMO - Dividend Comparison
BIOA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SIMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIOA BioAge Labs, Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SIMO Silicon Motion Technology Corporation | 0.79% | 2.16% | 3.70% | 0.82% | 2.31% | 1.62% | 2.89% | 2.45% | 3.45% | 1.68% | 1.51% | 1.88% |
Financials
BIOA vs. SIMO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BioAge Labs, Inc and Silicon Motion Technology Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BIOA and SIMO have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BIOA has higher volatility (103.31%) compared to SIMO (34.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIOA dropped -88.23% vs SIMO's -93.19%.
SIMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BIOA and SIMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer