BINV vs. FDEV
Compare and contrast key facts about Brandes International ETF (BINV) and Fidelity International Multifactor ETF (FDEV).
BINV and FDEV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BINV is an actively managed fund by Brandes. It was launched on Oct 3, 2023. FDEV is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity Targeted International Factor Index. It was launched on Feb 26, 2019.
Performance
BINV vs. FDEV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BINV vs. FDEV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BINV Brandes International ETF | 2.70% | 37.84% | 7.71% | 12.66% |
FDEV Fidelity International Multifactor ETF | 3.83% | 30.36% | 5.84% | 9.72% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BINV achieves a 2.70% return, which is significantly lower than FDEV's 3.83% return.
BINV
- 1D
- 2.87%
- 1M
- -7.36%
- YTD
- 2.70%
- 6M
- 7.98%
- 1Y
- 27.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDEV
- 1D
- 2.35%
- 1M
- -4.83%
- YTD
- 3.83%
- 6M
- 9.22%
- 1Y
- 25.14%
- 3Y*
- 14.97%
- 5Y*
- 7.95%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BINV vs. FDEV - Expense Ratio Comparison
BINV has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FDEV's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BINV vs. FDEV — Risk / Return Rank
BINV
FDEV
BINV vs. FDEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes International ETF (BINV) and Fidelity International Multifactor ETF (FDEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BINV | FDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.60 | 1.73 | -0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.27 | 2.41 | -0.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.35 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 2.85 | -0.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.13 | 11.64 | -2.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BINV | FDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60 | 1.73 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.67 | 0.53 | +1.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between BINV and FDEV is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BINV vs. FDEV - Dividend Comparison
BINV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than FDEV's 2.83% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BINV Brandes International ETF | 2.13% | 2.23% | 2.40% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDEV Fidelity International Multifactor ETF | 2.83% | 2.86% | 2.99% | 2.80% | 2.65% | 2.81% | 1.88% | 2.73% |
Drawdowns
BINV vs. FDEV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BINV drawdown since its inception was -14.91%, smaller than the maximum FDEV drawdown of -30.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BINV and FDEV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BINV | FDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.91% | -30.11% | +15.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.50% | -8.67% | -2.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.78% | -4.83% | -2.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.28% | -6.38% | +4.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 2.13% | +0.78% |
Volatility
BINV vs. FDEV - Volatility Comparison
Brandes International ETF (BINV) has a higher volatility of 6.79% compared to Fidelity International Multifactor ETF (FDEV) at 6.22%. This indicates that BINV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BINV | FDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.79% | 6.22% | +0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.06% | 9.15% | +0.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.40% | 14.62% | +2.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.69% | 13.85% | +0.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.69% | 15.38% | -0.69% |