PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BINC vs. IYH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BINC vs. IYH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC) and iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BINC achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly higher than IYH's -1.10% return.


BINC

1D
0.15%
1M
0.92%
YTD
1.29%
6M
1.78%
1Y
5.90%
3Y*
7.04%
5Y*
10Y*

IYH

1D
-0.46%
1M
5.37%
YTD
-1.10%
6M
-1.60%
1Y
14.30%
3Y*
6.09%
5Y*
4.89%
10Y*
9.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BINC vs. IYH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
1.29%7.57%5.76%7.12%
IYH
iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF
-1.10%13.16%2.99%4.30%

Correlation

The correlation between BINC and IYH is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2023

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BINC vs. IYH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BINC
BINC Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
BINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
BINC Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
BINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
BINC Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

IYH
IYH Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
IYH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYH Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
IYH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYH Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BINC vs. IYH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC) and iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BINCIYHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.17

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

1.35

+0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.60

3.21

+5.39

BINC vs. IYH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BINC Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the IYH Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BINC and IYH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BINC vs. IYH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BINC drawdown since its inception was -2.69%, smaller than the maximum IYH drawdown of -43.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BINC and IYH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BINCIYHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.69%

-43.12%

+40.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.69%

-10.64%

+7.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.69%

-17.91%

+15.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-4.38%

+4.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.36%

-8.96%

+8.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.69%

4.46%

-3.77%

Volatility

BINC vs. IYH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC) is 0.75%, while iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH) has a volatility of 4.97%. This indicates that BINC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IYH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BINCIYHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.75%

4.97%

-4.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.87%

10.61%

-8.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30%

15.11%

-12.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.99%

14.97%

-11.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.99%

16.75%

-13.76%

BINC vs. IYH - Expense Ratio Comparison

BINC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than IYH's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

BINC vs. IYH - Dividend Comparison

BINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.84%, more than IYH's 1.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
5.84%5.86%6.14%3.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IYH
iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF
1.51%1.19%1.25%1.18%1.10%0.94%1.16%1.14%1.95%1.10%1.29%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


BINC and IYH have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IYH has higher volatility (4.97%) compared to BINC (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BINC dropped -2.69% vs IYH's -43.12%.

On 3-year performance, BINC leads with 7.04% vs 6.09% for IYH. On fees, BINC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, BINC has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BINC has performed better with a 7.04% return vs 6.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BINC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for IYH.

BINC has the higher dividend yield at 5.84%, compared with 1.51% for IYH.

BINC is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while IYH is Health & Biotech Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BINC and 0.43% for IYH.

BINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BINC and IYH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer