BINC vs. IJR
BINC (iShares Flexible Income Active ETF) and IJR (iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BINC is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by iShares, while IJR is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Index. BINC is actively managed, while IJR is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BINC returned 7.04%/yr vs 15.09%/yr for IJR. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BINC charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for IJR.
Performance
BINC vs. IJR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BINC achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly lower than IJR's 19.86% return.
BINC
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.92%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 1.78%
- 1Y
- 5.90%
- 3Y*
- 7.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IJR
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 7.39%
- YTD
- 19.86%
- 6M
- 16.97%
- 1Y
- 37.16%
- 3Y*
- 15.09%
- 5Y*
- 6.35%
- 10Y*
- 11.21%
BINC vs. IJR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | 1.29% | 7.57% | 5.76% | 7.12% |
IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | 19.86% | 5.89% | 8.63% | 15.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between BINC and IJR is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2023 | 0.46 |
The correlation between BINC and IJR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BINC vs. IJR — Risk / Return Rank
BINC
IJR
BINC vs. IJR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC) and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BINC | IJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.36 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.20 | 4.30 | -2.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.60 | 14.44 | -5.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BINC vs. IJR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BINC drawdown since its inception was -2.69%, smaller than the maximum IJR drawdown of -58.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BINC and IJR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BINC | IJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.69% | -58.15% | +55.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.69% | -8.68% | +5.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.69% | -28.02% | +25.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | 0.00% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.36% | -9.27% | +8.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.69% | 2.58% | -1.89% |
Volatility
BINC vs. IJR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC) is 0.75%, while iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) has a volatility of 5.17%. This indicates that BINC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IJR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BINC | IJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.75% | 5.17% | -4.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.87% | 11.93% | -10.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30% | 17.67% | -15.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.99% | 21.44% | -18.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.99% | 22.93% | -19.94% |
BINC vs. IJR - Expense Ratio Comparison
BINC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IJR's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
BINC vs. IJR - Dividend Comparison
BINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.84%, more than IJR's 1.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | 5.84% | 5.86% | 6.14% | 3.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | 1.42% | 1.44% | 2.05% | 1.31% | 1.41% | 1.53% | 1.11% | 1.44% | 1.58% | 1.20% | 1.22% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BINC and IJR have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IJR has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to BINC (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BINC dropped -2.69% vs IJR's -58.15%.
On 3-year performance, IJR leads with 15.09% vs 7.04% for BINC. On fees, IJR is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, BINC has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IJR has performed better with a 15.09% return vs 7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJR is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for BINC.
BINC has the higher dividend yield at 5.84%, compared with 1.42% for IJR.
BINC is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while IJR is Small Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BINC and 0.06% for IJR.
BINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BINC and IJR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer