BINC vs. IAU
BINC (iShares Flexible Income Active ETF) and IAU (iShares Gold Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - BINC is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by iShares, while IAU is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. BINC is actively managed, while IAU is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BINC returned 7.02%/yr vs 31.29%/yr for IAU. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BINC charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IAU.
Performance
BINC vs. IAU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BINC achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly lower than IAU's 2.98% return.
BINC
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 0.90%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 5.80%
- 3Y*
- 7.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IAU
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 2.98%
- 6M
- 5.50%
- 1Y
- 32.20%
- 3Y*
- 31.29%
- 5Y*
- 18.32%
- 10Y*
- 13.31%
BINC vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | 0.90% | 7.57% | 5.76% | 7.08% |
IAU iShares Gold Trust | 2.98% | 63.95% | 26.85% | 4.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between BINC and IAU is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2023 | 0.29 |
BINC vs. IAU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BINC
IAU
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
BINC
IAU
-
Basic Materials
BINC
IAU
-
Industrials
BINC
IAU
-
Energy
BINC
IAU
-
Consumer Cyclical
BINC
-
IAU
-
Consumer Defensive
BINC
-
IAU
-
Technology
BINC
-
IAU
-
Utilities
BINC
-
IAU
-
Real Estate
BINC
IAU
Healthcare
BINC
IAU
-
Communication Services
BINC
IAU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BINC vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank
BINC
IAU
BINC vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BINC | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.24 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.17 | 1.69 | +0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.53 | 4.19 | +4.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BINC | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.56 | 1.23 | +1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.36 | 0.62 | +1.74 |
Drawdowns
BINC vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BINC drawdown since its inception was -2.69%, smaller than the maximum IAU drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BINC and IAU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BINC | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.69% | -45.14% | +42.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.69% | -19.18% | +16.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.69% | -19.18% | +16.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -21.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -17.70% | +17.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.36% | -15.96% | +15.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.68% | 7.71% | -7.03% |
Volatility
BINC vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC) is 0.75%, while iShares Gold Trust (IAU) has a volatility of 5.50%. This indicates that BINC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BINC | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.75% | 5.50% | -4.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.84% | 23.02% | -21.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28% | 26.42% | -24.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.00% | 17.95% | -14.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.00% | 15.90% | -12.90% |
BINC vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
BINC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IAU's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
BINC vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison
BINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.86%, while IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | 5.86% | 5.86% | 6.14% | 3.13% |
IAU iShares Gold Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BINC and IAU have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IAU has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to BINC (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BINC dropped -2.69% vs IAU's -45.14%.
On 3-year performance, IAU leads with 31.29% vs 7.02% for BINC. On fees, IAU is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, BINC has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IAU has performed better with a 31.29% return vs 7.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IAU is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for BINC.
BINC has the higher dividend yield at 5.86%, compared with 0.00% for IAU.
BINC is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while IAU is Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BINC and 0.25% for IAU.
BINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BINC and IAU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer