BILZ vs. LTPZ
BILZ (PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund) and LTPZ (PIMCO 15+ Year U.S. TIPS Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BILZ is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO, while LTPZ is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (15+ Y). BILZ is actively managed, while LTPZ is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BILZ returned 4.63%/yr vs -1.54%/yr for LTPZ. Their -0.01 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BILZ charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for LTPZ.
Performance
BILZ vs. LTPZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BILZ achieves a 2.08% return, which is significantly higher than LTPZ's -3.75% return.
BILZ
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- 2.08%
- 1Y
- 3.81%
- 3Y*
- 4.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.65%
LTPZ
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -3.73%
- 6M
- -3.61%
- YTD
- -3.75%
- 1Y
- -2.50%
- 3Y*
- -1.54%
- 5Y*
- -7.34%
- 10Y*
- -0.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.79%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $16.21M | $18.47M | $22.55M | |
| $11.36M | $8.24M | $7.63M |
BILZ vs. LTPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BILZ PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 2.08% | 4.21% | 5.25% | 2.87% |
LTPZ PIMCO 15+ Year U.S. TIPS Index ETF | -3.75% | 4.00% | -4.80% | -4.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between BILZ and LTPZ is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2023 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BILZ vs. LTPZ — Risk / Return Rank
BILZ
LTPZ
BILZ vs. LTPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ) and PIMCO 15+ Year U.S. TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BILZ | LTPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +18.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +116.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 44.52 | 0.98 | +43.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 196.19 | -0.20 | +196.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1,864.61 | -0.42 | +1,865.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BILZ vs. LTPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BILZ drawdown since its inception was -0.52%, smaller than the maximum LTPZ drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILZ and LTPZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BILZ | LTPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.52% | -40.99% | +40.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.02% | -8.09% | +8.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.17% | -12.64% | +12.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -35.53% | +35.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.01% | -12.60% | +12.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 3.86% | -3.86% |
Volatility
BILZ vs. LTPZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ) is 0.06%, while PIMCO 15+ Year U.S. TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ) has a volatility of 2.05%. This indicates that BILZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LTPZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BILZ | LTPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.06% | 2.05% | -1.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.15% | 6.79% | -6.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21% | 9.03% | -8.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.51% | 15.85% | -15.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.51% | 15.03% | -14.52% |
BILZ vs. LTPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BILZ has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than LTPZ's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BILZ vs. LTPZ - Dividend Comparison
BILZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, less than LTPZ's 6.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILZ PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 3.64% | 4.19% | 4.95% | 2.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LTPZ PIMCO 15+ Year U.S. TIPS Index ETF | 6.00% | 4.64% | 3.71% | 3.71% | 8.38% | 3.56% | 1.42% | 1.74% | 3.05% | 2.25% | 2.32% | 0.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BILZ and LTPZ have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LTPZ has higher volatility (2.05%) compared to BILZ (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BILZ dropped -0.52% vs LTPZ's -40.99%.
On 3-year performance, BILZ leads with 4.63% vs -1.54% for LTPZ. On fees, BILZ is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, BILZ has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BILZ has performed better with a 4.63% return vs -1.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BILZ is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for LTPZ.
LTPZ has the higher dividend yield at 6.00%, compared with 3.64% for BILZ.
BILZ is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while LTPZ is Inflation-Protected Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for BILZ and 0.20% for LTPZ.
BILZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (18.44 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BILZ and LTPZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer