BILZ vs. FLUD
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ) and Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF (FLUD).
BILZ and FLUD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BILZ is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Jun 21, 2023. FLUD is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jul 14, 2020.
Performance
BILZ vs. FLUD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BILZ vs. FLUD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BILZ PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 0.83% | 4.21% | 5.25% | 2.33% |
FLUD Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF | 0.68% | 5.36% | 5.44% | 3.30% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BILZ achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly higher than FLUD's 0.68% return.
BILZ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 0.83%
- 6M
- 1.85%
- 1Y
- 4.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLUD
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- YTD
- 0.68%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 4.50%
- 3Y*
- 5.42%
- 5Y*
- 3.47%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BILZ vs. FLUD - Expense Ratio Comparison
BILZ has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than FLUD's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
BILZ vs. FLUD — Risk / Return Rank
BILZ
FLUD
BILZ vs. FLUD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ) and Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF (FLUD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BILZ | FLUD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 19.30 | 2.61 | +16.69 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 117.88 | 4.10 | +113.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 44.85 | 1.54 | +43.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 203.30 | 10.63 | +192.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1,804.32 | 39.41 | +1,764.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BILZ | FLUD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.30 | 2.61 | +16.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 2.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 10.37 | 2.54 | +7.84 |
Correlation
The correlation between BILZ and FLUD is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BILZ vs. FLUD - Dividend Comparison
BILZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, less than FLUD's 4.48% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILZ PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 4.18% | 4.19% | 4.95% | 2.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLUD Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF | 4.48% | 4.51% | 4.97% | 4.72% | 1.39% | 0.92% | 0.93% |
Drawdowns
BILZ vs. FLUD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BILZ drawdown since its inception was -0.52%, smaller than the maximum FLUD drawdown of -1.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILZ and FLUD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BILZ | FLUD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.52% | -1.66% | +1.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.02% | -0.44% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -1.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.08% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.01% | -0.25% | +0.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 0.12% | -0.12% |
Volatility
BILZ vs. FLUD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ) is 0.05%, while Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF (FLUD) has a volatility of 0.38%. This indicates that BILZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLUD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BILZ | FLUD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.05% | 0.38% | -0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.14% | 1.12% | -0.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21% | 1.74% | -1.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.44% | 1.32% | -0.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.44% | 1.27% | -0.83% |