PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BILZ vs. CGUI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BILZ vs. CGUI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ) and Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF (CGUI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BILZ vs. CGUI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BILZ achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly higher than CGUI's 0.77% return.


BILZ

1D
0.00%
1M
0.28%
YTD
0.83%
6M
1.85%
1Y
4.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CGUI

1D
0.06%
1M
0.07%
YTD
0.77%
6M
1.85%
1Y
4.45%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BILZ vs. CGUI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BILZ has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than CGUI's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

BILZ vs. CGUI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BILZ
BILZ Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BILZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BILZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BILZ Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BILZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BILZ Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

CGUI
CGUI Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CGUI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGUI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGUI Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CGUI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGUI Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BILZ vs. CGUI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ) and Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF (CGUI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BILZCGUIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

19.30

6.25

+13.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

117.88

11.36

+106.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

44.85

2.75

+42.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

203.30

25.16

+178.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1,804.32

106.15

+1,698.16

BILZ vs. CGUI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BILZ Sharpe Ratio is 19.30, which is higher than the CGUI Sharpe Ratio of 6.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BILZ and CGUI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BILZCGUIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.30

6.25

+13.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

10.37

6.43

+3.95

Correlation

The correlation between BILZ and CGUI is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BILZ vs. CGUI - Dividend Comparison

BILZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, more than CGUI's 4.00% yield.


TTM202520242023
BILZ
PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund
4.18%4.19%4.95%2.23%
CGUI
Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF
4.00%4.17%2.62%0.00%

Drawdowns

BILZ vs. CGUI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BILZ drawdown since its inception was -0.52%, which is greater than CGUI's maximum drawdown of -0.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILZ and CGUI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BILZCGUIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.52%

-0.18%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.02%

-0.18%

+0.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.01%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.01%

-0.02%

+0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

0.04%

-0.04%

Volatility

BILZ vs. CGUI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ) is 0.05%, while Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF (CGUI) has a volatility of 0.30%. This indicates that BILZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGUI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BILZCGUIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.05%

0.30%

-0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.14%

0.47%

-0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21%

0.71%

-0.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.44%

0.79%

-0.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.44%

0.79%

-0.35%