PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BILS vs. YBTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BILS vs. YBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS) and Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BILS vs. YBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BILS
SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF
0.80%4.23%4.91%
YBTC
Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF
-18.34%-4.23%58.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BILS achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly higher than YBTC's -18.34% return.


BILS

1D
0.02%
1M
0.26%
YTD
0.80%
6M
1.82%
1Y
3.99%
3Y*
4.67%
5Y*
3.17%
10Y*

YBTC

1D
2.23%
1M
6.07%
YTD
-18.34%
6M
-38.39%
1Y
-14.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BILS vs. YBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BILS has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than YBTC's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BILS vs. YBTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BILS
BILS Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BILS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BILS Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BILS Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BILS Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BILS Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

YBTC
YBTC Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
YBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
YBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
YBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
YBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BILS vs. YBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS) and Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BILSYBTCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

16.39

-0.36

+16.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

75.13

-0.25

+75.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

26.69

0.97

+25.73

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

132.67

-0.32

+132.99

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1,118.82

-0.72

+1,119.54

BILS vs. YBTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BILS Sharpe Ratio is 16.39, which is higher than the YBTC Sharpe Ratio of -0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BILS and YBTC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BILSYBTCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.39

-0.36

+16.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

10.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

9.65

0.25

+9.40

Correlation

The correlation between BILS and YBTC is -0.05. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

BILS vs. YBTC - Dividend Comparison

BILS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, less than YBTC's 85.43% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
BILS
SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF
3.96%4.08%5.01%4.98%1.61%
YBTC
Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF
85.43%76.04%44.53%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BILS vs. YBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BILS drawdown since its inception was -0.41%, smaller than the maximum YBTC drawdown of -47.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILS and YBTC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BILSYBTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.41%

-47.09%

+46.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.03%

-47.09%

+47.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-40.36%

+40.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.04%

-11.04%

+11.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

20.83%

-20.83%

Volatility

BILS vs. YBTC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS) is 0.05%, while Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) has a volatility of 9.23%. This indicates that BILS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BILSYBTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.05%

9.23%

-9.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.15%

34.14%

-33.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24%

40.09%

-39.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.31%

41.60%

-41.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.30%

41.60%

-41.30%