BILS vs. SPTU
BILS (SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF) and SPTU (State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds from State Street - BILS tracks the Bloomberg 3-12 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index while SPTU tracks the ICE BofA US Treasury Bill Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BILS charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPTU.
Performance
BILS vs. SPTU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BILS achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly lower than SPTU's 1.48% return.
BILS
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- 1Y
- 3.90%
- 3Y*
- 4.66%
- 5Y*
- 3.29%
- 10Y*
- —
SPTU
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BILS vs. SPTU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BILS SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF | 1.40% | 0.93% |
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 1.48% | 0.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between BILS and SPTU is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BILS vs. SPTU — Risk / Return Rank
BILS
SPTU
BILS vs. SPTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS) and State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF (SPTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BILS | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 16.80 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 100.82 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 42.08 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 129.91 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1,442.41 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BILS | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 10.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 9.79 | 11.88 | -2.09 |
Drawdowns
BILS vs. SPTU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BILS drawdown since its inception was -0.41%, which is greater than SPTU's maximum drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILS and SPTU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BILS | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.41% | -0.04% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | 0.00% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.04% | -0.00% | -0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | — | — |
Volatility
BILS vs. SPTU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BILS | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.06% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.14% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23% | 0.32% | -0.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.31% | 0.32% | -0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.30% | 0.32% | -0.02% |
BILS vs. SPTU - Expense Ratio Comparison
BILS has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTU's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BILS vs. SPTU - Dividend Comparison
BILS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, more than SPTU's 2.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILS SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF | 3.81% | 4.08% | 5.01% | 4.98% | 1.61% |
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 2.36% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BILS and SPTU have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPTU is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPTU is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for BILS.
BILS has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 2.36% for SPTU.
BILS tracks Bloomberg 3-12 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index, while SPTU tracks ICE BofA US Treasury Bill Index. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for BILS and 0.05% for SPTU.
Find the right allocation for BILS and SPTU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer