PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BILS vs. SPTU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BILS vs. SPTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS) and State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF (SPTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BILS achieves a 1.57% return, which is significantly lower than SPTU's 1.66% return.


BILS

1D
0.00%
1M
0.24%
YTD
1.57%
6M
1.66%
1Y
3.84%
3Y*
4.61%
5Y*
3.33%
10Y*

SPTU

1D
0.03%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.66%
6M
1.74%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BILS vs. SPTU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BILS and SPTU is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BILS vs. SPTU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BILS
BILS Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BILS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BILS Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BILS Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BILS Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BILS Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

SPTU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BILS vs. SPTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS) and State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF (SPTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BILSSPTUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

34.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

127.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1,285.26

BILS vs. SPTU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BILS vs. SPTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BILS drawdown since its inception was -0.41%, which is greater than SPTU's maximum drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILS and SPTU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BILSSPTUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.41%

-0.04%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.04%

-0.00%

-0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

Volatility

BILS vs. SPTU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BILSSPTUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23%

0.33%

-0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.31%

0.33%

-0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.30%

0.33%

-0.03%

BILS vs. SPTU - Expense Ratio Comparison

BILS has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTU's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BILS vs. SPTU - Dividend Comparison

BILS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, more than SPTU's 2.36% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BILS
SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF
3.81%4.08%5.01%4.98%1.61%
SPTU
State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF
2.36%0.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BILS and SPTU have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPTU is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPTU is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for BILS.

BILS has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 2.36% for SPTU.

BILS tracks Bloomberg 3-12 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index, while SPTU tracks ICE BofA US Treasury Bill Index. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for BILS and 0.05% for SPTU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BILS and SPTU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer