BILPX vs. WCFRX
BILPX (BlackRock Event Driven Equity Fund) and WCFRX (Virtus Westchester Credit Event Fund) are both Event Driven funds. Over the past 5 years, BILPX returned 3.61%/yr vs 3.22%/yr for WCFRX. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BILPX charges 1.16%/yr vs 1.90%/yr for WCFRX.
Performance
BILPX vs. WCFRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BILPX achieves a 1.35% return, which is significantly higher than WCFRX's 1.02% return.
BILPX
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 2.29%
- 1Y
- 5.16%
- 3Y*
- 6.85%
- 5Y*
- 3.61%
- 10Y*
- 4.96%
WCFRX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 1.02%
- 6M
- 1.34%
- 1Y
- 3.35%
- 3Y*
- 5.75%
- 5Y*
- 3.22%
- 10Y*
- —
BILPX vs. WCFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILPX BlackRock Event Driven Equity Fund | 1.35% | 8.43% | 4.37% | 5.38% | 0.01% | 1.95% | 6.30% | 7.29% | 5.12% |
WCFRX Virtus Westchester Credit Event Fund | 1.02% | 4.37% | 6.83% | 9.23% | -5.28% | 7.08% | 16.26% | 12.60% | -3.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between BILPX and WCFRX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2018 | 0.39 |
The correlation between BILPX and WCFRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.41 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BILPX vs. WCFRX — Risk / Return Rank
BILPX
WCFRX
BILPX vs. WCFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Event Driven Equity Fund (BILPX) and Virtus Westchester Credit Event Fund (WCFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BILPX | WCFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.42 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.52 | 2.66 | +0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.62 | 6.80 | +6.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BILPX | WCFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | 2.07 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | 0.78 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.85 | -0.49 |
Drawdowns
BILPX vs. WCFRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BILPX drawdown since its inception was -47.50%, which is greater than WCFRX's maximum drawdown of -23.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILPX and WCFRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BILPX | WCFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.50% | -23.56% | -23.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.53% | -1.29% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.33% | -6.09% | +2.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.18% | -9.57% | +4.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -11.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | 0.00% | -0.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.53% | -4.29% | -1.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.39% | 0.51% | -0.12% |
Volatility
BILPX vs. WCFRX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Event Driven Equity Fund (BILPX) has a higher volatility of 0.82% compared to Virtus Westchester Credit Event Fund (WCFRX) at 0.63%. This indicates that BILPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WCFRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BILPX | WCFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.82% | 0.63% | +0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.22% | 1.38% | +0.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.93% | 1.67% | +1.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.09% | 4.15% | -0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.64% | 6.58% | -1.94% |
BILPX vs. WCFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BILPX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is lower than WCFRX's 1.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
BILPX vs. WCFRX - Dividend Comparison
BILPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, less than WCFRX's 7.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILPX BlackRock Event Driven Equity Fund | 4.14% | 4.19% | 4.16% | 1.99% | 2.58% | 2.66% | 2.97% | 3.41% | 1.97% | 5.12% | 1.11% | 74.64% |
WCFRX Virtus Westchester Credit Event Fund | 7.21% | 5.82% | 5.33% | 4.15% | 0.21% | 13.79% | 0.90% | 2.99% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BILPX and WCFRX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BILPX has higher volatility (0.82%) compared to WCFRX (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BILPX dropped -47.50% vs WCFRX's -23.56%.
WCFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BILPX and WCFRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer