PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BILD vs. CRAK
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BILD vs. CRAK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF (BILD) and VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BILD vs. CRAK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BILD
Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF
9.56%21.08%-2.68%3.97%
CRAK
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF
29.10%39.11%-15.05%1.44%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BILD achieves a 9.56% return, which is significantly lower than CRAK's 29.10% return.


BILD

1D
0.55%
1M
-2.79%
YTD
9.56%
6M
11.25%
1Y
26.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CRAK

1D
-1.98%
1M
4.65%
YTD
29.10%
6M
33.54%
1Y
71.28%
3Y*
19.41%
5Y*
15.61%
10Y*
12.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BILD vs. CRAK - Expense Ratio Comparison

BILD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than CRAK's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BILD vs. CRAK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BILD
BILD Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
BILD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BILD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
BILD Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
BILD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
BILD Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

CRAK
CRAK Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CRAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRAK Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CRAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRAK Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BILD vs. CRAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF (BILD) and VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BILDCRAKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.10

3.41

-1.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.74

4.16

-1.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.62

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

4.77

-1.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.23

20.58

-6.35

BILD vs. CRAK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BILD Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is lower than the CRAK Sharpe Ratio of 3.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BILD and CRAK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BILDCRAKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

3.41

-1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.03

0.53

+0.50

Correlation

The correlation between BILD and CRAK is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BILD vs. CRAK - Dividend Comparison

BILD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, more than CRAK's 1.56% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BILD
Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF
2.80%3.05%5.53%0.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CRAK
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF
1.56%2.02%5.60%3.65%3.08%2.40%2.64%1.49%2.42%1.66%3.42%0.47%

Drawdowns

BILD vs. CRAK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BILD drawdown since its inception was -14.78%, smaller than the maximum CRAK drawdown of -58.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILD and CRAK.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BILDCRAKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.78%

-58.80%

+44.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.09%

-15.07%

+6.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.98%

-1.98%

-1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.75%

-12.63%

+8.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

3.49%

-1.61%

Volatility

BILD vs. CRAK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF (BILD) is 3.66%, while VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) has a volatility of 5.81%. This indicates that BILD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BILDCRAKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.66%

5.81%

-2.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.35%

13.42%

-6.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.66%

20.99%

-8.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.12%

20.45%

-7.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.12%

22.11%

-8.99%