BIGY.TO vs. HBTE.NEO
BIGY.TO (Evolve US Equity UltraYield ETF) and HBTE.NEO (Harvest Bitcoin Leaders Enhanced Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BIGY.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Evolve, while HBTE.NEO is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Harvest. Both are actively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BIGY.TO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for HBTE.NEO.
Performance
BIGY.TO vs. HBTE.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIGY.TO achieves a -9.61% return, which is significantly lower than HBTE.NEO's 28.08% return.
BIGY.TO
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -9.45%
- YTD
- -9.61%
- 6M
- -11.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HBTE.NEO
- 1D
- 2.94%
- 1M
- 4.14%
- YTD
- 28.08%
- 6M
- 14.49%
- 1Y
- 67.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BIGY.TO vs. HBTE.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BIGY.TO Evolve US Equity UltraYield ETF | -9.61% | -1.05% |
HBTE.NEO Harvest Bitcoin Leaders Enhanced Income ETF | 28.08% | -8.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between BIGY.TO and HBTE.NEO is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BIGY.TO vs. HBTE.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
BIGY.TO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HBTE.NEO
BIGY.TO vs. HBTE.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve US Equity UltraYield ETF (BIGY.TO) and Harvest Bitcoin Leaders Enhanced Income ETF (HBTE.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BIGY.TO | HBTE.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.19 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.14 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.19 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BIGY.TO vs. HBTE.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIGY.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.81%, smaller than the maximum HBTE.NEO drawdown of -55.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIGY.TO and HBTE.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIGY.TO | HBTE.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.81% | -55.67% | +27.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -55.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.91% | -24.58% | +5.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.48% | -21.15% | +9.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 28.79% | — |
Volatility
BIGY.TO vs. HBTE.NEO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BIGY.TO | HBTE.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 18.57% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 50.16% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.05% | 66.62% | -37.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.05% | 66.35% | -37.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.05% | 66.35% | -37.30% |
BIGY.TO vs. HBTE.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIGY.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than HBTE.NEO's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
BIGY.TO vs. HBTE.NEO - Dividend Comparison
BIGY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.05%, more than HBTE.NEO's 26.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BIGY.TO Evolve US Equity UltraYield ETF | 30.05% | 9.54% |
HBTE.NEO Harvest Bitcoin Leaders Enhanced Income ETF | 26.16% | 18.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BIGY.TO and HBTE.NEO have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BIGY.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BIGY.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HBTE.NEO.
BIGY.TO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while HBTE.NEO is Leveraged Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Evolve and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BIGY.TO and 0.75% for HBTE.NEO.
Find the right allocation for BIGY.TO and HBTE.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer