BIGY.TO vs. BASE.TO
BIGY.TO (Evolve US Equity UltraYield ETF) and BASE.TO (Evolve Global Materials & Mining Enhanced Yield Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BIGY.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Evolve, while BASE.TO is a Materials fund tracking the Solactive Materials & Mining. BIGY.TO is actively managed, while BASE.TO is passively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BIGY.TO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for BASE.TO.
Performance
BIGY.TO vs. BASE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIGY.TO achieves a -8.43% return, which is significantly lower than BASE.TO's 29.29% return.
BIGY.TO
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- -8.27%
- YTD
- -8.43%
- 6M
- -9.26%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BASE.TO
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 3.92%
- YTD
- 29.29%
- 6M
- 30.16%
- 1Y
- 56.95%
- 3Y*
- 17.29%
- 5Y*
- 10.04%
- 10Y*
- —
BIGY.TO vs. BASE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BIGY.TO Evolve US Equity UltraYield ETF | -8.43% | -1.05% |
BASE.TO Evolve Global Materials & Mining Enhanced Yield Index ETF | 29.29% | 14.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between BIGY.TO and BASE.TO is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BIGY.TO vs. BASE.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BIGY.TO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BASE.TO
BIGY.TO vs. BASE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve US Equity UltraYield ETF (BIGY.TO) and Evolve Global Materials & Mining Enhanced Yield Index ETF (BASE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BIGY.TO | BASE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.41 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.65 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.21 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BIGY.TO vs. BASE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIGY.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.81%, smaller than the maximum BASE.TO drawdown of -33.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIGY.TO and BASE.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIGY.TO | BASE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.81% | -33.43% | +5.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.86% | -1.33% | -16.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.51% | -9.28% | -2.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.76% | — |
Volatility
BIGY.TO vs. BASE.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BIGY.TO | BASE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.01% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.01% | 23.18% | +5.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.01% | 23.16% | +5.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.01% | 26.41% | +2.60% |
BIGY.TO vs. BASE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIGY.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than BASE.TO's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
BIGY.TO vs. BASE.TO - Dividend Comparison
BIGY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.66%, more than BASE.TO's 7.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BASE.TO Evolve Global Materials & Mining Enhanced Yield Index ETF | 7.87% | 9.55% | 11.20% | 8.80% | 8.96% | 5.95% | 4.67% | 2.88% |
BIGY.TO Evolve US Equity UltraYield ETF | 29.66% | 9.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BIGY.TO and BASE.TO have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BASE.TO is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BASE.TO is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for BIGY.TO.
BIGY.TO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BASE.TO is Materials. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BIGY.TO and 0.00% for BASE.TO.
Find the right allocation for BIGY.TO and BASE.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer