BIDG vs. NTSD
BIDG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF) and NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. BIDG is passively managed, while NTSD is actively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BIDG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NTSD.
Performance
BIDG vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BIDG
- 1D
- 3.13%
- 1M
- 9.71%
- YTD
- -8.59%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NTSD
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- 6.63%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BIDG vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BIDG Leverage Shares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF | 18.51% |
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 19.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between BIDG and NTSD is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026 | 0.59 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BIDG vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF (BIDG) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BIDG | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 5.46 | -5.31 |
Drawdowns
BIDG vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIDG drawdown since its inception was -59.34%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIDG and NTSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIDG | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.34% | -5.20% | -54.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.18% | -0.04% | -39.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.33% | -0.83% | -31.50% |
Volatility
BIDG vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BIDG | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.62% | 24.10% | +78.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 102.62% | 24.10% | +78.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 102.62% | 24.10% | +78.52% |
BIDG vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIDG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
BIDG vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison
Neither BIDG nor NTSD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BIDG and NTSD have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BIDG.
BIDG and NTSD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BIDG and 0.35% for NTSD.
Find the right allocation for BIDG and NTSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer