BIDAX vs. MPA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BIDAX (iShares Municipal Bond Index Fund) and MPA (BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds from BlackRock. Over the past 5 years, BIDAX returned 0.69%/yr vs -1.34%/yr for MPA. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BIDAX charges 0.50%/yr vs 2.28%/yr for MPA.

Performance

BIDAX vs. MPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Municipal Bond Index Fund (BIDAX) and BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund (MPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIDAX achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly lower than MPA's 3.87% return.

BIDAX

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 0.72%
• YTD: 1.41%
• 6M: 1.76%
• 1Y: 6.97%
• 3Y*: 3.69%
• 5Y*: 0.69%
• 10Y*: —

MPA

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: 0.91%
• YTD: 3.87%
• 6M: 2.19%
• 1Y: 10.61%
• 3Y*: 5.20%
• 5Y*: -1.34%
• 10Y*: 1.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIDAX vs. MPA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BIDAX iShares Municipal Bond Index Fund	1.41%	4.52%	1.44%	5.74%	-9.41%	1.38%	4.70%	7.56%	1.44%
MPA BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund	3.87%	1.82%	6.23%	9.67%	-31.00%	17.06%	9.14%	18.87%	-0.14%

Correlation

The correlation between BIDAX and MPA is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2018	0.37

Return for Risk

BIDAX vs. MPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIDAX

BIDAX Risk / Return Rank: 67
BIDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
BIDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
BIDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
BIDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
BIDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

MPA

MPA Risk / Return Rank: 22
MPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
MPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
MPA Omega Ratio Rank: 20
MPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
MPA Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIDAX vs. MPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Municipal Bond Index Fund (BIDAX) and BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund (MPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BIDAX	MPA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.63	1.31	+1.31
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.14	1.98	+2.16
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.66	1.24	+0.42
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.37	1.66	+0.71
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.02	6.56	+1.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BIDAX vs. MPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIDAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is higher than the MPA Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIDAX and MPA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BIDAX	MPA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.63	1.31	+1.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17	-0.11	+0.28
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.15	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.37	+0.17

Drawdowns

BIDAX vs. MPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIDAX drawdown since its inception was -14.39%, smaller than the maximum MPA drawdown of -44.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIDAX and MPA.

Drawdown Indicators

	BIDAX	MPA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.39%	-44.78%	+30.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.95%	-6.42%	+3.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.07%	-15.25%	+9.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.39%	-38.10%	+23.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.10%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.65%	-17.34%	+16.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.52%	-9.76%	+6.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.87%	1.62%	-0.75%

Volatility

BIDAX vs. MPA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Municipal Bond Index Fund (BIDAX) is 1.06%, while BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund (MPA) has a volatility of 2.56%. This indicates that BIDAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BIDAX	MPA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.06%	2.56%	-1.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.06%	6.24%	-4.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.68%	8.12%	-5.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.08%	12.11%	-8.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.44%	12.32%	-7.88%

BIDAX vs. MPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIDAX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than MPA's 2.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

BIDAX vs. MPA - Dividend Comparison

BIDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, less than MPA's 6.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BIDAX iShares Municipal Bond Index Fund	3.11%	4.09%	3.25%	2.16%	1.92%	2.36%	2.35%	3.64%	0.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MPA BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund	6.05%	6.98%	6.02%	3.63%	5.60%	3.94%	4.12%	4.16%	5.40%	5.22%	5.56%	5.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BIDAX and MPA in my portfolio?

BIDAX and MPA have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BIDAX or MPA?

MPA has higher volatility (2.56%) compared to BIDAX (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIDAX dropped -14.39% vs MPA's -44.78%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BIDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.