PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIDAX vs. BMN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIDAX vs. BMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Municipal Bond Index Fund (BIDAX) and Blackrock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust (BMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIDAX achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly higher than BMN's -0.14% return.


BIDAX

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.55%
YTD
1.41%
6M
1.76%
1Y
6.37%
3Y*
3.56%
5Y*
0.69%
10Y*

BMN

1D
0.13%
1M
0.71%
YTD
-0.14%
6M
1.68%
1Y
7.51%
3Y*
5.63%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIDAX vs. BMN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BIDAX
iShares Municipal Bond Index Fund
1.41%4.52%1.44%5.74%5.43%
BMN
Blackrock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust
-0.14%7.05%12.65%1.89%-2.86%

Correlation

The correlation between BIDAX and BMN is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2022

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIDAX vs. BMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIDAX
BIDAX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
BIDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
BIDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

BMN
BMN Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
BMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMN Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
BMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMN Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIDAX vs. BMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Municipal Bond Index Fund (BIDAX) and Blackrock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust (BMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BIDAXBMNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.11

+0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

0.92

+1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.33

2.55

+4.78

BIDAX vs. BMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIDAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the BMN Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIDAX and BMN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BIDAX vs. BMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIDAX drawdown since its inception was -14.39%, which is greater than BMN's maximum drawdown of -13.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIDAX and BMN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIDAXBMNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.39%

-13.04%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.95%

-8.18%

+5.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.07%

-12.41%

+6.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-5.71%

+5.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.49%

-2.35%

-1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

2.95%

-2.06%

Volatility

BIDAX vs. BMN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Municipal Bond Index Fund (BIDAX) is 0.75%, while Blackrock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust (BMN) has a volatility of 6.03%. This indicates that BIDAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIDAXBMNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.75%

6.03%

-5.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.06%

11.32%

-9.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66%

13.40%

-10.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.08%

10.97%

-6.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.42%

10.97%

-6.55%

BIDAX vs. BMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIDAX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BMN's 0.93% expense ratio.


Dividends

BIDAX vs. BMN - Dividend Comparison

BIDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, less than BMN's 4.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BIDAX
iShares Municipal Bond Index Fund
3.11%4.09%3.25%2.16%1.92%2.36%2.35%3.64%0.48%
BMN
Blackrock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust
4.40%4.30%4.40%4.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIDAX and BMN have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BMN has higher volatility (6.03%) compared to BIDAX (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIDAX dropped -14.39% vs BMN's -13.04%.

BIDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIDAX and BMN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer