BICSX vs. FFGTX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio (BICSX) and Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M (FFGTX).
BICSX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Oct 2, 2011. FFGTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 25, 2009.
Performance
BICSX vs. FFGTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BICSX vs. FFGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BICSX BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio | 19.23% | 28.70% | 4.38% | -4.32% | 11.90% | 22.44% | 6.80% | 11.60% | -14.50% | 8.28% |
FFGTX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M | 22.70% | 27.96% | 2.37% | -5.62% | 20.06% | 25.38% | 5.41% | 17.23% | -13.73% | 17.38% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BICSX achieves a 19.23% return, which is significantly lower than FFGTX's 22.70% return. Over the past 10 years, BICSX has underperformed FFGTX with an annualized return of 10.38%, while FFGTX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.28% annualized return.
BICSX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- YTD
- 19.23%
- 6M
- 26.56%
- 1Y
- 40.74%
- 3Y*
- 16.08%
- 5Y*
- 14.24%
- 10Y*
- 10.38%
FFGTX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.64%
- YTD
- 22.70%
- 6M
- 30.84%
- 1Y
- 51.60%
- 3Y*
- 17.10%
- 5Y*
- 15.16%
- 10Y*
- 13.28%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BICSX vs. FFGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BICSX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than FFGTX's 1.52% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BICSX vs. FFGTX — Risk / Return Rank
BICSX
FFGTX
BICSX vs. FFGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio (BICSX) and Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M (FFGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BICSX | FFGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.54 | 2.52 | +0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.22 | 3.03 | +0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.48 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.87 | 3.39 | +0.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.67 | 17.47 | +2.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BICSX | FFGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.54 | 2.52 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 0.71 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.59 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.33 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between BICSX and FFGTX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BICSX vs. FFGTX - Dividend Comparison
BICSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than FFGTX's 1.64% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BICSX BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio | 2.59% | 3.09% | 3.60% | 9.39% | 9.05% | 2.68% | 0.80% | 2.03% | 2.12% | 0.65% | 0.94% | 0.00% |
FFGTX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M | 1.64% | 2.02% | 1.93% | 1.47% | 1.47% | 2.91% | 1.03% | 2.51% | 1.57% | 0.36% | 1.05% | 2.07% |
Drawdowns
BICSX vs. FFGTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BICSX drawdown since its inception was -51.59%, smaller than the maximum FFGTX drawdown of -58.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BICSX and FFGTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BICSX | FFGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.59% | -58.53% | +6.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.53% | -14.66% | +4.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.35% | -27.31% | +4.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.82% | -48.88% | +13.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -2.37% | +1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.75% | -20.56% | -0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 2.85% | -0.78% |
Volatility
BICSX vs. FFGTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio (BICSX) is 4.48%, while Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M (FFGTX) has a volatility of 6.12%. This indicates that BICSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BICSX | FFGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.48% | 6.12% | -1.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.47% | 13.74% | -1.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.34% | 20.50% | -4.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.83% | 21.55% | -5.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.12% | 22.54% | -7.42% |