BICPX vs. FCSRX
BICPX (BlackRock 20/80 Target Allocation Fund) and FCSRX (Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, BICPX returned 3.88%/yr vs 4.42%/yr for FCSRX. Their 0.58 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BICPX charges 0.11%/yr vs 1.70%/yr for FCSRX.
Performance
BICPX vs. FCSRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BICPX achieves a 2.67% return, which is significantly lower than FCSRX's 6.55% return. Over the past 10 years, BICPX has underperformed FCSRX with an annualized return of 3.88%, while FCSRX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.42% annualized return.
BICPX
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- 6M
- 1.36%
- YTD
- 2.67%
- 1Y
- 7.45%
- 3Y*
- 6.01%
- 5Y*
- 1.61%
- 10Y*
- 3.88%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.74%
FCSRX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- 6M
- 2.98%
- YTD
- 6.55%
- 1Y
- 12.24%
- 3Y*
- 7.14%
- 5Y*
- 4.52%
- 10Y*
- 4.42%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.96%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
BICPX vs. FCSRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BICPX BlackRock 20/80 Target Allocation Fund | 2.67% | 10.57% | 1.29% | 9.05% | -14.67% | 0.23% | 15.50% | 12.57% | -2.21% | 7.94% |
FCSRX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C | 6.55% | 9.27% | 4.75% | 3.60% | -4.26% | 14.68% | 2.60% | 9.54% | -5.03% | 3.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between BICPX and FCSRX is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 26, 2006 | 0.58 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BICPX and FCSRX has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BICPX vs. FCSRX — Risk / Return Rank
BICPX
FCSRX
BICPX vs. FCSRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock 20/80 Target Allocation Fund (BICPX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C (FCSRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BICPX | FCSRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.47 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 3.36 | -1.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.83 | 10.54 | -3.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BICPX vs. FCSRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BICPX drawdown since its inception was -31.00%, smaller than the maximum FCSRX drawdown of -33.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BICPX and FCSRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BICPX | FCSRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.00% | -33.91% | +2.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.43% | -3.50% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.69% | -5.85% | -2.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.94% | -13.22% | -5.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.94% | -20.02% | +1.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.40% | -2.33% | +0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.70% | -5.07% | +1.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.12% | 1.11% | +0.01% |
Volatility
BICPX vs. FCSRX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock 20/80 Target Allocation Fund (BICPX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C (FCSRX) have volatilities of 1.55% and 1.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BICPX | FCSRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.55% | 1.62% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.61% | 3.78% | +0.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.35% | 4.88% | +0.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.35% | 6.90% | +0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.43% | 6.71% | -0.28% |
BICPX vs. FCSRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BICPX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than FCSRX's 1.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
BICPX vs. FCSRX - Dividend Comparison
BICPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, more than FCSRX's 2.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BICPX BlackRock 20/80 Target Allocation Fund | 4.29% | 4.41% | 0.00% | 3.50% | 3.54% | 4.89% | 4.25% | 2.46% | 5.15% | 2.71% | 1.85% | 6.53% |
FCSRX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C | 2.54% | 3.74% | 3.86% | 4.35% | 6.51% | 4.53% | 1.32% | 2.20% | 8.51% | 1.58% | 1.34% | 0.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BICPX and FCSRX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FCSRX has higher volatility (1.62%) compared to BICPX (1.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BICPX dropped -31.00% vs FCSRX's -33.91%.
FCSRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BICPX and FCSRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer