PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIAUX vs. SSLCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIAUX vs. SSLCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory Small-Cap Fundamental Value Fund (BIAUX) and DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BIAUX having a 11.88% return and SSLCX slightly lower at 11.54%. Over the past 10 years, BIAUX has underperformed SSLCX with an annualized return of 9.79%, while SSLCX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.81% annualized return.


BIAUX

1D
-0.67%
1M
-1.10%
YTD
11.88%
6M
12.78%
1Y
30.43%
3Y*
15.57%
5Y*
7.53%
10Y*
9.79%

SSLCX

1D
0.02%
1M
0.59%
YTD
11.54%
6M
12.94%
1Y
17.17%
3Y*
13.30%
5Y*
6.13%
10Y*
10.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIAUX vs. SSLCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIAUX
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Fundamental Value Fund
11.88%5.71%11.73%16.16%-8.74%31.11%-5.69%29.85%-13.48%12.17%
SSLCX
DWS Small Cap Core Fund
11.54%4.99%9.85%13.09%-13.53%41.16%14.65%21.72%-14.28%11.63%

Correlation

The correlation between BIAUX and SSLCX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2009

0.91

The correlation between BIAUX and SSLCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIAUX vs. SSLCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIAUX
BIAUX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
BIAUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIAUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIAUX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
BIAUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIAUX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

SSLCX
SSLCX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
SSLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
SSLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIAUX vs. SSLCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Small-Cap Fundamental Value Fund (BIAUX) and DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BIAUXSSLCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.74

1.25

+0.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.58

1.80

+0.78

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.22

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

2.05

+1.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.15

6.49

+3.66

BIAUX vs. SSLCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIAUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the SSLCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIAUX and SSLCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BIAUXSSLCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

1.25

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.36

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.52

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.39

+0.21

Drawdowns

BIAUX vs. SSLCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIAUX drawdown since its inception was -45.55%, smaller than the maximum SSLCX drawdown of -63.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIAUX and SSLCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIAUXSSLCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.55%

-63.14%

+17.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.22%

-8.78%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.16%

-17.34%

-7.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.16%

-22.57%

-2.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.55%

-48.07%

+2.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.59%

-0.44%

-1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.19%

-11.31%

+5.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

2.77%

+0.05%

Volatility

BIAUX vs. SSLCX - Volatility Comparison

Brown Advisory Small-Cap Fundamental Value Fund (BIAUX) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX) at 3.96%. This indicates that BIAUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSLCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIAUXSSLCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

3.96%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.19%

9.96%

+1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.02%

14.27%

+2.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.78%

17.37%

+2.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.56%

21.04%

+0.52%

BIAUX vs. SSLCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIAUX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than SSLCX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

BIAUX vs. SSLCX - Dividend Comparison

BIAUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.05%, more than SSLCX's 1.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIAUX
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Fundamental Value Fund
12.05%13.49%16.54%5.94%6.16%0.48%0.47%9.38%14.31%4.11%0.34%2.41%
SSLCX
DWS Small Cap Core Fund
1.08%1.21%1.52%0.68%1.07%1.67%0.35%0.16%5.99%5.78%0.60%8.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIAUX and SSLCX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BIAUX has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to SSLCX (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIAUX dropped -45.55% vs SSLCX's -63.14%.

BIAUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIAUX and SSLCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer