PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIALX vs. FIQOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIALX vs. FIQOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory Global Leaders Fund (BIALX) and Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class Z (FIQOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIALX achieves a -5.15% return, which is significantly lower than FIQOX's 23.79% return.


BIALX

1D
0.36%
1M
-0.93%
YTD
-5.15%
6M
-5.33%
1Y
0.89%
3Y*
10.15%
5Y*
6.10%
10Y*
11.97%

FIQOX

1D
1.96%
1M
5.74%
YTD
23.79%
6M
23.42%
1Y
43.32%
3Y*
31.01%
5Y*
16.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIALX vs. FIQOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BIALX
Brown Advisory Global Leaders Fund
-5.15%14.96%13.99%26.00%-19.66%16.65%20.26%33.95%-7.01%
FIQOX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class Z
23.79%16.27%46.05%25.10%-25.64%18.58%31.08%29.13%-10.40%

Correlation

The correlation between BIALX and FIQOX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

0.89

Over the past year, the correlation between BIALX and FIQOX has dropped to 0.68 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIALX vs. FIQOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIALX
BIALX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BIALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIALX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BIALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIALX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

FIQOX
FIQOX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FIQOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIQOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIQOX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FIQOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIQOX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIALX vs. FIQOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Global Leaders Fund (BIALX) and Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class Z (FIQOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BIALXFIQOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.41

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.05

3.63

-3.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.16

15.38

-15.22

BIALX vs. FIQOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIALX Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is lower than the FIQOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIALX and FIQOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BIALX vs. FIQOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIALX drawdown since its inception was -32.45%, roughly equal to the maximum FIQOX drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIALX and FIQOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIALXFIQOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.45%

-33.64%

+1.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.77%

-11.74%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.71%

-22.59%

+8.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.02%

-33.64%

+4.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.04%

0.00%

-7.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.87%

-7.82%

+2.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.13%

2.76%

+1.37%

Volatility

BIALX vs. FIQOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brown Advisory Global Leaders Fund (BIALX) is 4.86%, while Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class Z (FIQOX) has a volatility of 7.84%. This indicates that BIALX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIQOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIALXFIQOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.86%

7.84%

-2.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.01%

15.25%

-4.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.94%

18.66%

-5.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.86%

20.26%

-3.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.49%

21.27%

-3.78%

BIALX vs. FIQOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BIALX and FIQOX have an expense ratio of 0.90%.


Dividends

BIALX vs. FIQOX - Dividend Comparison

BIALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, less than FIQOX's 9.37% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BIALX
Brown Advisory Global Leaders Fund
5.92%5.61%0.36%0.37%0.51%1.08%0.10%0.24%0.26%0.09%0.18%
FIQOX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class Z
9.37%11.60%26.02%1.10%6.51%12.99%8.23%5.09%9.32%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIALX and FIQOX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIQOX has higher volatility (7.84%) compared to BIALX (4.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIALX dropped -32.45% vs FIQOX's -33.64%.

FIQOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIALX and FIQOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer