BHYB.AX vs. DRUG.AX

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

BHYB.AX (BetaShares Australian Major Bank Hybrids Index ETF) and DRUG.AX (Betashares Global Healthcare Currency Hedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BHYB.AX is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the Solactive Australian Banking Preferred Shares Index, while DRUG.AX is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Global ex-Australia Healthcare Hedged AUD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BHYB.AX returned 3.41%/yr vs 4.03%/yr for DRUG.AX. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BHYB.AX charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for DRUG.AX.

Performance

BHYB.AX vs. DRUG.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in BetaShares Australian Major Bank Hybrids Index ETF (BHYB.AX) and Betashares Global Healthcare Currency Hedged ETF (DRUG.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BHYB.AX achieves a 1.65% return, which is significantly higher than DRUG.AX's 1.49% return.

BHYB.AX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 1.06%
• 6M: 1.42%
• YTD: 1.65%
• 1Y: 3.40%
• 3Y*: 4.34%
• 5Y*: 3.41%
• 10Y*: —

DRUG.AX

• 1D: 1.89%
• 1M: 5.32%
• 6M: 0.23%
• YTD: 1.49%
• 1Y: 17.07%
• 3Y*: 6.21%
• 5Y*: 4.03%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BHYB.AX vs. DRUG.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BHYB.AX BetaShares Australian Major Bank Hybrids Index ETF	1.65%	3.04%	5.62%	2.68%	1.66%	3.18%
DRUG.AX Betashares Global Healthcare Currency Hedged ETF	1.49%	11.83%	1.82%	0.76%	-3.68%	15.95%

Correlation

The correlation between BHYB.AX and DRUG.AX is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.01
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021	0.05

Return for Risk

BHYB.AX vs. DRUG.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BHYB.AX

BHYB.AX Risk / Return Rank: 55
BHYB.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
BHYB.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
BHYB.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 52
BHYB.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
BHYB.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 52

DRUG.AX

DRUG.AX Risk / Return Rank: 38
DRUG.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
DRUG.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
DRUG.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
DRUG.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
DRUG.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BHYB.AX vs. DRUG.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaShares Australian Major Bank Hybrids Index ETF (BHYB.AX) and Betashares Global Healthcare Currency Hedged ETF (DRUG.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BHYB.AX	DRUG.AX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	1.07	+0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	1.70	+0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.20	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.58	1.56	+1.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.66	3.72	+2.94

BHYB.AX vs. DRUG.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BHYB.AX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the DRUG.AX Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BHYB.AX and DRUG.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BHYB.AX vs. DRUG.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BHYB.AX drawdown since its inception was -5.16%, smaller than the maximum DRUG.AX drawdown of -26.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BHYB.AX and DRUG.AX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BHYB.AX	DRUG.AX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.16%	-26.79%	+21.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.29%	-10.69%	+9.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.62%	-20.63%	+18.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-5.16%	-20.63%	+15.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.61%	+2.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.67%	-5.17%	+4.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.50%	4.52%	-4.02%

Volatility

BHYB.AX vs. DRUG.AX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BetaShares Australian Major Bank Hybrids Index ETF (BHYB.AX) is 0.72%, while Betashares Global Healthcare Currency Hedged ETF (DRUG.AX) has a volatility of 6.29%. This indicates that BHYB.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRUG.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BHYB.AX	DRUG.AX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.72%	6.29%	-5.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.99%	11.71%	-9.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.51%	15.65%	-13.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.32%	14.95%	-11.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.31%	16.17%	-12.86%

BHYB.AX vs. DRUG.AX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BHYB.AX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DRUG.AX's 0.57% expense ratio.

Dividends

BHYB.AX vs. DRUG.AX - Dividend Comparison

BHYB.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, less than DRUG.AX's 3.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BHYB.AX BetaShares Australian Major Bank Hybrids Index ETF	3.33%	3.69%	4.34%	4.44%	2.79%	1.43%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DRUG.AX Betashares Global Healthcare Currency Hedged ETF	3.63%	0.00%	2.84%	0.00%	0.00%	4.49%	0.62%	0.28%	3.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BHYB.AX and DRUG.AX in my portfolio?

BHYB.AX and DRUG.AX have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BHYB.AX or DRUG.AX?

On fees, BHYB.AX is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BHYB.AX or DRUG.AX?

BHYB.AX is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for DRUG.AX.

What is the main difference between BHYB.AX and DRUG.AX?

BHYB.AX is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while DRUG.AX is Health & Biotech Equities. BHYB.AX tracks Solactive Australian Banking Preferred Shares Index, while DRUG.AX tracks Nasdaq Global ex-Australia Healthcare Hedged AUD Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BHYB.AX and 0.57% for DRUG.AX.