PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BHP vs. BTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BHP vs. BTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BHP Group Limited (BHP) and British American Tobacco p.l.c. (BTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BHP achieves a 53.40% return, which is significantly higher than BTI's 11.67% return. Over the past 10 years, BHP has outperformed BTI with an annualized return of 23.18%, while BTI has yielded a comparatively lower 7.69% annualized return.


BHP

1D
3.20%
1M
0.01%
YTD
53.40%
6M
55.28%
1Y
90.03%
3Y*
19.44%
5Y*
16.25%
10Y*
23.18%

BTI

1D
1.51%
1M
-4.64%
YTD
11.67%
6M
12.20%
1Y
35.86%
3Y*
34.54%
5Y*
17.96%
10Y*
7.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BHP vs. BTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BHP
BHP Group Limited
53.40%28.91%-24.64%16.50%44.34%0.91%25.37%24.50%10.55%33.87%
BTI
British American Tobacco p.l.c.
11.67%65.81%35.44%-19.97%14.91%7.95%-4.73%42.97%-49.35%24.40%

Correlation

The correlation between BHP and BTI is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 1987

0.24

The correlation between BHP and BTI shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BHP:

$231.09B

BTI:

$136.67B

EPS

BHP:

$8.51

BTI:

£4.93

PE Ratio

BHP:

10.67

BTI:

9.44

PEG Ratio

BHP:

2.95

BTI:

0.35

PS Ratio

BHP:

2.15

BTI:

1.99

PB Ratio

BHP:

4.58

BTI:

2.13

Total Revenue (TTM)

BHP:

$107.64B

BTI:

£51.48B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BHP:

$89.04B

BTI:

£42.82B

EBITDA (TTM)

BHP:

$52.23B

BTI:

£20.34B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BHP vs. BTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BHP
BHP Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
BHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
BHP Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
BHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
BHP Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

BTI
BTI Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
BTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTI Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
BTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTI Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BHP vs. BTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BHP Group Limited (BHP) and British American Tobacco p.l.c. (BTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BHPBTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.26

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.57

2.62

+1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.96

5.89

+11.07

BHP vs. BTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BHP Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is higher than the BTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BHP and BTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BHP vs. BTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BHP drawdown since its inception was -76.22%, which is greater than BTI's maximum drawdown of -64.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BHP and BTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BHPBTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.22%

-64.11%

-12.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.80%

-13.75%

-6.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.21%

-13.75%

-23.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.21%

-29.94%

-7.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.29%

-56.00%

+11.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.50%

-6.57%

+4.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.28%

-12.93%

-8.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.38%

6.10%

-0.72%

Volatility

BHP vs. BTI - Volatility Comparison

BHP Group Limited (BHP) has a higher volatility of 13.72% compared to British American Tobacco p.l.c. (BTI) at 7.53%. This indicates that BHP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BHPBTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.72%

7.53%

+6.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.69%

18.39%

+8.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.39%

22.78%

+9.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.44%

21.16%

+11.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.34%

24.20%

+8.14%

Dividends

BHP vs. BTI - Dividend Comparison

BHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, less than BTI's 4.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BHP
BHP Group Limited
2.93%3.64%5.98%4.98%22.44%9.98%3.67%8.59%4.89%3.61%1.68%9.38%
BTI
British American Tobacco p.l.c.
4.95%5.29%8.18%9.72%7.23%7.98%7.22%6.35%8.53%4.27%3.85%4.11%

Financials

BHP vs. BTI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BHP Group Limited and British American Tobacco p.l.c.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B20212022202320242025
27.95B
13.54B
(BHP) Total Revenue
(BTI) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BHP values in USD, BTI values in GBP

BHP vs. BTI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between BHP Group Limited and British American Tobacco p.l.c. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20212022202320242025
42.9%
83.4%
Portfolio components
BHP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BHP Group Limited reported a gross profit of 11.98B and revenue of 27.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.9%.

BTI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, British American Tobacco p.l.c. reported a gross profit of 11.30B and revenue of 13.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.4%.

BHP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BHP Group Limited reported an operating income of 11.98B and revenue of 27.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.9%.

BTI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, British American Tobacco p.l.c. reported an operating income of 4.93B and revenue of 13.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.4%.

BHP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BHP Group Limited reported a net income of 5.65B and revenue of 27.95B, resulting in a net margin of 20.2%.

BTI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, British American Tobacco p.l.c. reported a net income of 3.25B and revenue of 13.54B, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BHP and BTI have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BHP has higher volatility (13.72%) compared to BTI (7.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BHP dropped -76.22% vs BTI's -64.11%.

BHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BHP and BTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer