PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BHDG vs. BTCZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BHDG vs. BTCZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nicholas Bitcoin Tail ETF (BHDG) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BHDG

1D
1.61%
1M
9.60%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BTCZ

1D
5.56%
1M
60.49%
YTD
39.90%
6M
53.41%
1Y
60.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BHDG vs. BTCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BHDG and BTCZ is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026

0.94

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BHDG vs. BTCZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BHDG

BTCZ
BTCZ Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
BTCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BHDG vs. BTCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Bitcoin Tail ETF (BHDG) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BHDG vs. BTCZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BHDGBTCZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.54

-0.55

+0.02

Drawdowns

BHDG vs. BTCZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BHDG drawdown since its inception was -15.06%, smaller than the maximum BTCZ drawdown of -91.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BHDG and BTCZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BHDGBTCZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.06%

-91.06%

+76.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.21%

-77.44%

+71.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.23%

-73.73%

+64.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.76%

Volatility

BHDG vs. BTCZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BHDGBTCZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

67.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.88%

87.54%

-68.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.88%

97.10%

-78.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.88%

97.10%

-78.22%

BHDG vs. BTCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BHDG has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than BTCZ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

BHDG vs. BTCZ - Dividend Comparison

BHDG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.


PositionTTM20252024
BHDG
Nicholas Bitcoin Tail ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
BTCZ
T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF
0.01%0.02%0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, BHDG and BTCZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, BTCZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BTCZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for BHDG.

BTCZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for BHDG.

They also come from different issuers: Nicholas and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for BHDG and 0.95% for BTCZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BHDG and BTCZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer