PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BHBFX vs. GQHPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BHBFX vs. GQHPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Madison Dividend Income Fund (BHBFX) and GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BHBFX achieves a 11.96% return, which is significantly lower than GQHPX's 13.55% return.


BHBFX

1D
-0.73%
1M
1.31%
6M
5.46%
YTD
11.96%
1Y
16.74%
3Y*
8.89%
5Y*
6.03%
10Y*
9.71%
ALL TIME*
10.03%

GQHPX

1D
-0.82%
1M
2.68%
6M
7.38%
YTD
13.55%
1Y
16.78%
3Y*
11.65%
5Y*
10.77%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BHBFX vs. GQHPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BHBFX
Madison Dividend Income Fund
11.96%8.19%7.62%1.76%-5.50%9.55%
GQHPX
GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund
13.55%7.53%12.69%3.94%6.73%10.34%

Correlation

The correlation between BHBFX and GQHPX is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between BHBFX and GQHPX has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BHBFX vs. GQHPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BHBFX
BHBFX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
BHBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BHBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
BHBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
BHBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
BHBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

GQHPX
GQHPX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
GQHPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQHPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQHPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
GQHPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQHPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BHBFX vs. GQHPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Dividend Income Fund (BHBFX) and GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BHBFXGQHPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.26

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

2.53

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.37

6.76

-0.39

BHBFX vs. GQHPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BHBFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the GQHPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BHBFX and GQHPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BHBFX vs. GQHPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BHBFX drawdown since its inception was -34.07%, which is greater than GQHPX's maximum drawdown of -17.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BHBFX and GQHPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BHBFXGQHPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.07%

-17.26%

-16.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.39%

-6.50%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.32%

-8.71%

-5.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.80%

-17.26%

-6.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

-1.02%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-3.34%

-0.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

2.43%

-0.14%

Volatility

BHBFX vs. GQHPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Madison Dividend Income Fund (BHBFX) is 3.13%, while GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX) has a volatility of 4.32%. This indicates that BHBFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GQHPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BHBFXGQHPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.13%

4.32%

-1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.47%

9.14%

-1.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.28%

11.03%

-0.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.54%

12.74%

+2.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.32%

12.74%

+4.58%

BHBFX vs. GQHPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BHBFX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than GQHPX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

BHBFX vs. GQHPX - Dividend Comparison

BHBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.19%, more than GQHPX's 3.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BHBFX
Madison Dividend Income Fund
11.19%12.41%14.14%6.01%9.39%11.53%1.53%3.95%12.73%3.89%3.76%6.06%
GQHPX
GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund
3.66%2.98%3.14%2.64%3.24%0.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BHBFX and GQHPX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GQHPX has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to BHBFX (3.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BHBFX dropped -34.07% vs GQHPX's -17.26%.

GQHPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BHBFX and GQHPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer