BGU.TO vs. RUD.TO
BGU.TO (Bristol Gate Concentrated US Equity ETF) and RUD.TO (RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD)) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BGU.TO returned 9.27%/yr vs 15.88%/yr for RUD.TO. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
BGU.TO vs. RUD.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGU.TO achieves a 7.16% return, which is significantly lower than RUD.TO's 12.65% return.
BGU.TO
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 3.59%
- YTD
- 7.16%
- 1Y
- 12.19%
- 3Y*
- 13.49%
- 5Y*
- 9.27%
- 10Y*
- —
RUD.TO
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 1.53%
- 6M
- 9.91%
- YTD
- 12.65%
- 1Y
- 21.63%
- 3Y*
- 18.95%
- 5Y*
- 15.88%
- 10Y*
- 16.92%
BGU.TO vs. RUD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGU.TO Bristol Gate Concentrated US Equity ETF | 7.16% | 4.62% | 18.85% | 20.28% | -13.23% | 30.22% | 8.27% | 30.25% | 2.31% |
RUD.TO RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD) | 12.65% | 7.35% | 25.76% | 23.90% | -15.14% | 54.34% | 13.61% | 25.93% | 4.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGU.TO and RUD.TO is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2018 | 0.57 |
The correlation between BGU.TO and RUD.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGU.TO vs. RUD.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BGU.TO
RUD.TO
BGU.TO vs. RUD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bristol Gate Concentrated US Equity ETF (BGU.TO) and RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD) (RUD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BGU.TO | RUD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.32 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 3.27 | -2.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.07 | 11.63 | -8.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BGU.TO vs. RUD.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGU.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.66%, smaller than the maximum RUD.TO drawdown of -35.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGU.TO and RUD.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGU.TO | RUD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.66% | -35.99% | +4.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.12% | -6.65% | -4.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.03% | -28.31% | +11.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.46% | -28.31% | +2.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.10% | -0.64% | -1.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.24% | -10.04% | +4.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.98% | 1.86% | +2.12% |
Volatility
BGU.TO vs. RUD.TO - Volatility Comparison
Bristol Gate Concentrated US Equity ETF (BGU.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.40% compared to RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD) (RUD.TO) at 2.63%. This indicates that BGU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RUD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGU.TO | RUD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.40% | 2.63% | +0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.45% | 9.35% | +1.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.09% | 12.42% | +0.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.01% | 34.44% | -18.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.35% | 44.70% | -26.35% |
Dividends
BGU.TO vs. RUD.TO - Dividend Comparison
BGU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RUD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGU.TO Bristol Gate Concentrated US Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RUD.TO RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD) | 1.36% | 1.38% | 3.43% | 5.24% | 5.51% | 3.38% | 5.73% | 6.77% | 7.06% | 6.23% | 6.07% | 7.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BGU.TO and RUD.TO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Bristol Gate and RBC.
Find the right allocation for BGU.TO and RUD.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer