PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
BGRT.NEO vs. CGR.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

BGRT.NEO vs. CGR.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BGRT.NEO (BMO Global REIT Fund Active ETF Series) and CGR.TO (iShares Global Real Estate Index ETF) are both REIT funds. BGRT.NEO is actively managed, while CGR.TO is passively managed. Over the past year, BGRT.NEO returned 6.97% vs 10.50% for CGR.TO. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BGRT.NEO charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for CGR.TO.

Performance

BGRT.NEO vs. CGR.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Global REIT Fund Active ETF Series (BGRT.NEO) and iShares Global Real Estate Index ETF (CGR.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGRT.NEO achieves a 6.70% return, which is significantly lower than CGR.TO's 9.33% return.

BGRT.NEO

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.62%
YTD
6.70%
6M
5.55%
1Y
6.97%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

CGR.TO

1D
1.38%
1M
0.30%
YTD
9.33%
6M
7.94%
1Y
10.50%
3Y*
10.69%
5Y*
3.88%
10Y*
4.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGRT.NEO vs. CGR.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023
BGRT.NEO
BMO Global REIT Fund Active ETF Series		6.70%1.51%5.79%8.18%
CGR.TO
iShares Global Real Estate Index ETF		9.33%2.56%9.99%11.88%

Correlation

The correlation between BGRT.NEO and CGR.TO is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2023

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BMO Global REIT Fund Active ETF Series

iShares Global Real Estate Index ETF

Often compared with BGRT.NEO:
BGRT.NEO vs. RIT.TOBGRT.NEO vs. MREL.TOBGRT.NEO vs. VRE.TOBGRT.NEO vs. HCRE.TOBGRT.NEO vs. XRE.TOBGRT.NEO vs. ZEQT.TOBGRT.NEO vs. ZUQ.TO
Often compared with CGR.TO:
CGR.TO vs. XRE.TOCGR.TO vs. REETCGR.TO vs. RS.TOCGR.TO vs. VFV.TOCGR.TO vs. ^GSPCCGR.TO vs. VCRCGR.TO vs. VNQI

Return for Risk

BGRT.NEO vs. CGR.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
BGRT.NEO
BGRT.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
BGRT.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGRT.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGRT.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
BGRT.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGRT.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
CGR.TO
CGR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
CGR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
CGR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGRT.NEO vs. CGR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Global REIT Fund Active ETF Series (BGRT.NEO) and iShares Global Real Estate Index ETF (CGR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

BGRT.NEOCGR.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.72
0.84

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.96
1.24

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.16

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

1.10

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.08

3.52

-0.44

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BGRT.NEO vs. CGR.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGRT.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is comparable to the CGR.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGRT.NEO and CGR.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

BGRT.NEOCGR.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

0.84

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.26

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.25

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.28

+0.26

Drawdowns

BGRT.NEO vs. CGR.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGRT.NEO drawdown since its inception was -16.06%, smaller than the maximum CGR.TO drawdown of -52.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGRT.NEO and CGR.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

BGRT.NEOCGR.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.06%

-52.90%

+36.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.17%

-9.55%

+3.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-14.40%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-28.76%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-33.71%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.24%

-1.64%

-0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.02%

-9.98%

+5.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.27%

2.99%

-0.72%

Volatility

BGRT.NEO vs. CGR.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Global REIT Fund Active ETF Series (BGRT.NEO) is 2.59%, while iShares Global Real Estate Index ETF (CGR.TO) has a volatility of 4.00%. This indicates that BGRT.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGR.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

BGRT.NEOCGR.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

4.00%

-1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.12%

9.95%

-1.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.72%

12.57%

-2.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.16%

15.03%

-0.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.16%

16.56%

-2.40%

BGRT.NEO vs. CGR.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGRT.NEO has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than CGR.TO's 0.72% expense ratio.

Dividends

BGRT.NEO vs. CGR.TO - Dividend Comparison

BGRT.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, more than CGR.TO's 2.30% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BGRT.NEO
BMO Global REIT Fund Active ETF Series		3.94%4.14%4.03%1.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CGR.TO
iShares Global Real Estate Index ETF		2.30%2.51%2.52%2.59%2.40%1.70%2.22%2.10%2.54%4.25%2.83%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

BGRT.NEO and CGR.TO have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CGR.TO is cheaper at 0.72% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CGR.TO is cheaper with a 0.72% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for BGRT.NEO.

They also come from different issuers: BMO and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for BGRT.NEO and 0.72% for CGR.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BGRT.NEO and CGR.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer