BGRIX vs. FMDGX
BGRIX (Baron Growth Fund Institutional Shares) and FMDGX (Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, BGRIX returned -4.48%/yr vs 6.73%/yr for FMDGX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BGRIX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for FMDGX.
Performance
BGRIX vs. FMDGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGRIX achieves a -12.81% return, which is significantly lower than FMDGX's 3.79% return.
BGRIX
- 1D
- -1.66%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- -12.81%
- 6M
- -10.28%
- 1Y
- -21.75%
- 3Y*
- -5.97%
- 5Y*
- -4.48%
- 10Y*
- 7.24%
FMDGX
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- 3.26%
- YTD
- 3.79%
- 6M
- 2.25%
- 1Y
- 5.68%
- 3Y*
- 16.02%
- 5Y*
- 6.73%
- 10Y*
- —
BGRIX vs. FMDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGRIX Baron Growth Fund Institutional Shares | -12.81% | -14.21% | 4.90% | 14.97% | -22.35% | 20.13% | 33.10% | 6.12% |
FMDGX Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund | 3.79% | 8.60% | 22.03% | 25.79% | -26.67% | 12.67% | 34.84% | 4.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGRIX and FMDGX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2019 | 0.82 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BGRIX and FMDGX has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGRIX vs. FMDGX — Risk / Return Rank
BGRIX
FMDGX
BGRIX vs. FMDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Growth Fund Institutional Shares (BGRIX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BGRIX | FMDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.07 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.81 | 0.39 | -1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.46 | 1.13 | -2.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BGRIX | FMDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.14 | 0.35 | -1.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.22 | 0.30 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.44 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
BGRIX vs. FMDGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGRIX drawdown since its inception was -41.12%, which is greater than FMDGX's maximum drawdown of -38.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGRIX and FMDGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGRIX | FMDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.12% | -38.59% | -2.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.73% | -14.75% | -11.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.37% | -25.30% | -7.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.60% | -38.59% | +3.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.05% | -2.11% | -28.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.54% | -11.20% | +3.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.90% | 5.05% | +9.85% |
Volatility
BGRIX vs. FMDGX - Volatility Comparison
Baron Growth Fund Institutional Shares (BGRIX) has a higher volatility of 7.54% compared to Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX) at 3.75%. This indicates that BGRIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGRIX | FMDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.54% | 3.75% | +3.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.18% | 12.66% | +2.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.04% | 16.49% | +2.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.15% | 22.37% | -2.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.15% | 24.32% | -3.17% |
BGRIX vs. FMDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGRIX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FMDGX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
BGRIX vs. FMDGX - Dividend Comparison
BGRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.62%, more than FMDGX's 1.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGRIX Baron Growth Fund Institutional Shares | 22.62% | 19.72% | 11.30% | 1.69% | 5.72% | 7.38% | 4.45% | 3.55% | 8.12% | 11.36% | 12.56% | 9.37% |
FMDGX Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund | 1.79% | 1.85% | 0.47% | 0.63% | 0.81% | 6.43% | 0.36% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BGRIX and FMDGX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BGRIX has higher volatility (7.54%) compared to FMDGX (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGRIX dropped -41.12% vs FMDGX's -38.59%.
FMDGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.35 vs -1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BGRIX and FMDGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer