PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BGLD vs. FAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BGLD vs. FAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (FAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BGLD vs. FAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BGLD
FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF
1.46%33.03%21.80%13.24%-2.42%-2.48%
FAPR
FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April
1.26%7.58%18.14%19.50%-10.33%8.65%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGLD achieves a 1.46% return, which is significantly higher than FAPR's 1.26% return.


BGLD

1D
1.28%
1M
-6.16%
YTD
1.46%
6M
3.57%
1Y
18.03%
3Y*
20.72%
5Y*
12.47%
10Y*

FAPR

1D
0.17%
1M
0.37%
YTD
1.26%
6M
3.33%
1Y
9.51%
3Y*
13.35%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BGLD vs. FAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGLD has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than FAPR's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BGLD vs. FAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGLD
BGLD Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
BGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
BGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

FAPR
FAPR Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
FAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGLD vs. FAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (FAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BGLDFAPRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.49

0.82

+0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.06

1.22

+0.83

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.30

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

1.03

+0.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.19

5.74

+2.45

BGLD vs. FAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is higher than the FAPR Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGLD and FAPR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BGLDFAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

0.82

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.11

0.81

+0.31

Correlation

The correlation between BGLD and FAPR is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BGLD vs. FAPR - Dividend Comparison

BGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.68%, while FAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022
BGLD
FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF
43.68%44.32%25.04%10.49%0.40%
FAPR
FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BGLD vs. FAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGLD drawdown since its inception was -16.19%, roughly equal to the maximum FAPR drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGLD and FAPR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BGLDFAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.19%

-15.96%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.11%

-9.75%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.16%

0.00%

-6.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.54%

-2.80%

-0.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

1.74%

+0.45%

Volatility

BGLD vs. FAPR - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD) has a higher volatility of 6.56% compared to FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (FAPR) at 1.77%. This indicates that BGLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BGLDFAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.56%

1.77%

+4.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.36%

2.63%

+6.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.12%

11.61%

+0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.89%

10.58%

-0.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.88%

10.58%

-0.70%