BGLD vs. DZZ
Compare and contrast key facts about FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD) and DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ).
BGLD and DZZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BGLD is an actively managed fund by FT Vest. It was launched on Jan 20, 2021. DZZ is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold (-200%). It was launched on Feb 27, 2008.
Performance
BGLD vs. DZZ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BGLD vs. DZZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGLD FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF | 0.18% | 33.03% | 21.80% | 13.24% | -2.42% | -5.57% |
DZZ DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes | -31.51% | 132.78% | -35.06% | -8.14% | 2.79% | 0.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGLD achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly higher than DZZ's -31.51% return.
BGLD
- 1D
- 2.63%
- 1M
- -6.42%
- YTD
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 2.66%
- 1Y
- 16.42%
- 3Y*
- 20.21%
- 5Y*
- 12.18%
- 10Y*
- —
DZZ
- 1D
- -2.77%
- 1M
- 3.34%
- YTD
- -31.51%
- 6M
- 72.00%
- 1Y
- 61.35%
- 3Y*
- 3.35%
- 5Y*
- -3.31%
- 10Y*
- -8.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BGLD vs. DZZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGLD has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than DZZ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BGLD vs. DZZ — Risk / Return Rank
BGLD
DZZ
BGLD vs. DZZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD) and DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BGLD | DZZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.37 | 0.37 | +1.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.89 | 2.35 | -0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.31 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 0.85 | +0.67 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.80 | 1.46 | +6.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BGLD | DZZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 0.37 | +1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.24 | -0.04 | +1.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | -0.21 | +1.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between BGLD and DZZ is -0.54. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
BGLD vs. DZZ - Dividend Comparison
BGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.24%, while DZZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGLD FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF | 44.24% | 44.32% | 25.04% | 10.49% | 0.40% |
DZZ DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BGLD vs. DZZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGLD drawdown since its inception was -16.19%, smaller than the maximum DZZ drawdown of -96.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGLD and DZZ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGLD | DZZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.19% | -96.64% | +80.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.11% | -74.95% | +63.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.19% | -74.95% | +58.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -80.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.35% | -93.59% | +86.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.54% | -82.19% | +78.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 43.32% | -41.17% |
Volatility
BGLD vs. DZZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD) is 6.83%, while DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ) has a volatility of 15.61%. This indicates that BGLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DZZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BGLD | DZZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.83% | 15.61% | -8.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.28% | 126.04% | -116.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.06% | 168.01% | -155.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.88% | 82.53% | -72.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.87% | 63.37% | -53.50% |