BGLD vs. CPSP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BGLD (FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF) and CPSP (Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April) are both exchange-traded funds - BGLD is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by FT Vest, while CPSP is a S&P 500 fund actively managed by Calamos. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BGLD returned 12.93% vs 7.13% for CPSP. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BGLD charges 0.91%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CPSP.

Performance

BGLD vs. CPSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CPSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGLD achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly lower than CPSP's 3.18% return.

BGLD

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: 0.80%
• YTD: 0.32%
• 6M: 1.34%
• 1Y: 12.93%
• 3Y*: 19.37%
• 5Y*: 11.20%
• 10Y*: —

CPSP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.60%
• YTD: 3.18%
• 6M: 3.74%
• 1Y: 7.13%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGLD vs. CPSP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BGLD FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF	0.32%	16.33%
CPSP Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April	3.18%	5.46%

Correlation

The correlation between BGLD and CPSP is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025	0.11

Return for Risk

BGLD vs. CPSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGLD

BGLD Risk / Return Rank: 28
BGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
BGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
BGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 31
BGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
BGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 27

CPSP

CPSP Risk / Return Rank: 98
CPSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CPSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CPSP Omega Ratio Rank: 98
CPSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CPSP Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGLD vs. CPSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CPSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BGLD	CPSP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	5.08	-3.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.51	9.15	-7.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	2.31	-1.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.17	19.11	-17.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.72	96.35	-92.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BGLD vs. CPSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the CPSP Sharpe Ratio of 5.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGLD and CPSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BGLD	CPSP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.09	5.08	-3.98
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.13	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.05	3.17	-2.12

Drawdowns

BGLD vs. CPSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGLD drawdown since its inception was -16.19%, which is greater than CPSP's maximum drawdown of -1.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGLD and CPSP.

Drawdown Indicators

	BGLD	CPSP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.19%	-1.73%	-14.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.11%	-0.37%	-10.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.11%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.22%	0.00%	-7.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.64%	-0.08%	-3.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.49%	0.07%	+3.42%

Volatility

BGLD vs. CPSP - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD) has a higher volatility of 2.20% compared to Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CPSP) at 0.32%. This indicates that BGLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BGLD	CPSP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.20%	0.32%	+1.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.04%	0.84%	+9.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.90%	1.42%	+10.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.97%	2.37%	+7.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.89%	2.37%	+7.52%

BGLD vs. CPSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGLD has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than CPSP's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

BGLD vs. CPSP - Dividend Comparison

BGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.18%, while CPSP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BGLD FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF	44.18%	44.32%	25.04%	10.49%	0.40%
CPSP Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BGLD and CPSP in my portfolio?

BGLD and CPSP have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BGLD or CPSP?

BGLD has higher volatility (2.20%) compared to CPSP (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGLD dropped -16.19% vs CPSP's -1.73%.

Which ETF is better, BGLD or CPSP?

On 1-year performance, BGLD leads with 12.93% vs 7.13% for CPSP. On fees, CPSP is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, CPSP has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BGLD or CPSP?

Over the 1-year period, BGLD has performed better with a 12.93% return vs 7.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BGLD or CPSP?

CPSP is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.91% for BGLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BGLD or CPSP?

BGLD has the higher dividend yield at 44.18%, compared with 0.00% for CPSP.

What is the main difference between BGLD and CPSP?

BGLD is categorized as Defined Outcome, while CPSP is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.91% for BGLD and 0.69% for CPSP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CPSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.08 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.