PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BGITX vs. SAHMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BGITX vs. SAHMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baillie Gifford International Alpha Fund (BGITX) and SA International Value Fund (SAHMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BGITX having a 10.60% return and SAHMX slightly higher at 10.98%. Over the past 10 years, BGITX has underperformed SAHMX with an annualized return of 7.94%, while SAHMX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.81% annualized return.


BGITX

1D
1.90%
1M
7.36%
YTD
10.60%
6M
13.14%
1Y
13.29%
3Y*
13.07%
5Y*
1.92%
10Y*
7.94%

SAHMX

1D
-0.82%
1M
0.73%
YTD
10.98%
6M
15.31%
1Y
33.51%
3Y*
22.76%
5Y*
13.01%
10Y*
10.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGITX vs. SAHMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BGITX
Baillie Gifford International Alpha Fund
10.60%19.51%5.03%18.77%-28.71%-0.72%26.59%32.17%-16.61%31.67%
SAHMX
SA International Value Fund
10.98%44.08%5.44%16.49%-3.70%17.59%-2.48%14.61%-17.95%25.06%

Correlation

The correlation between BGITX and SAHMX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.64

The correlation between BGITX and SAHMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BGITX vs. SAHMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGITX
BGITX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
BGITX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGITX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGITX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
BGITX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGITX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

SAHMX
SAHMX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
SAHMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAHMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAHMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SAHMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAHMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGITX vs. SAHMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford International Alpha Fund (BGITX) and SA International Value Fund (SAHMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BGITXSAHMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.90

3.16

-2.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.35

4.35

-2.99

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.58

-0.41

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

5.10

-4.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.96

18.02

-14.06

BGITX vs. SAHMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGITX Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the SAHMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGITX and SAHMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BGITXSAHMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

3.16

-2.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.86

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.67

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.33

+0.09

Drawdowns

BGITX vs. SAHMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGITX drawdown since its inception was -44.45%, smaller than the maximum SAHMX drawdown of -66.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGITX and SAHMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BGITXSAHMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.45%

-66.58%

+22.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.89%

-8.72%

-4.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.07%

-14.85%

-3.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.08%

-25.10%

-18.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.45%

-48.63%

+4.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.57%

+1.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.81%

-16.18%

+4.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.57%

2.47%

+1.10%

Volatility

BGITX vs. SAHMX - Volatility Comparison

Baillie Gifford International Alpha Fund (BGITX) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to SA International Value Fund (SAHMX) at 2.79%. This indicates that BGITX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SAHMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BGITXSAHMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.21%

2.79%

+2.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.18%

9.28%

+3.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.09%

12.26%

+3.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.29%

15.49%

+3.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.16%

16.45%

+2.71%

BGITX vs. SAHMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGITX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than SAHMX's 1.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

BGITX vs. SAHMX - Dividend Comparison

BGITX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.27%, more than SAHMX's 4.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BGITX
Baillie Gifford International Alpha Fund
11.27%12.46%4.26%1.25%1.77%8.00%2.28%5.00%9.76%0.99%0.00%0.00%
SAHMX
SA International Value Fund
4.82%5.35%3.57%3.46%4.06%3.05%2.09%3.66%1.93%2.46%2.89%1.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


BGITX and SAHMX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BGITX has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to SAHMX (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGITX dropped -44.45% vs SAHMX's -66.58%.

SAHMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BGITX and SAHMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer