PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BGIN.NEO vs. ZSP.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BGIN.NEO vs. ZSP.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Global Innovators Fund Active ETF Series (BGIN.NEO) and BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGIN.NEO achieves a 54.53% return, which is significantly higher than ZSP.TO's 12.15% return.


BGIN.NEO

1D
0.78%
1M
21.71%
YTD
54.53%
6M
53.21%
1Y
88.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZSP.TO

1D
-0.29%
1M
7.18%
YTD
12.15%
6M
10.04%
1Y
28.96%
3Y*
23.44%
5Y*
16.74%
10Y*
15.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGIN.NEO vs. ZSP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BGIN.NEO
BMO Global Innovators Fund Active ETF Series
54.53%19.37%32.08%11.72%
ZSP.TO
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF
12.15%12.02%35.07%10.29%

Correlation

The correlation between BGIN.NEO and ZSP.TO is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2023

0.39

Over the past year, BGIN.NEO and ZSP.TO have become more correlated (0.64) than their long-term average of 0.39, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BGIN.NEO vs. ZSP.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGIN.NEO
BGIN.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
BGIN.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGIN.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGIN.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
BGIN.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGIN.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

ZSP.TO
ZSP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ZSP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZSP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZSP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ZSP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZSP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGIN.NEO vs. ZSP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Global Innovators Fund Active ETF Series (BGIN.NEO) and BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BGIN.NEOZSP.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.44

2.53

+0.92

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.02

3.45

+0.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.47

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.75

3.38

+3.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.35

12.70

+8.65

BGIN.NEO vs. ZSP.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGIN.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 3.44, which is higher than the ZSP.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGIN.NEO and ZSP.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BGIN.NEOZSP.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.44

2.53

+0.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.57

1.15

+0.41

Drawdowns

BGIN.NEO vs. ZSP.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGIN.NEO drawdown since its inception was -29.19%, which is greater than ZSP.TO's maximum drawdown of -26.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGIN.NEO and ZSP.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BGIN.NEOZSP.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.19%

-26.94%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.23%

-8.61%

-4.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.29%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.44%

-3.34%

-1.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.17%

2.29%

+1.88%

Volatility

BGIN.NEO vs. ZSP.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO Global Innovators Fund Active ETF Series (BGIN.NEO) has a higher volatility of 9.24% compared to BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP.TO) at 3.14%. This indicates that BGIN.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZSP.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BGIN.NEOZSP.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.24%

3.14%

+6.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.40%

8.65%

+12.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.92%

11.53%

+14.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.10%

14.97%

+11.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.10%

16.36%

+9.74%

BGIN.NEO vs. ZSP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGIN.NEO has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than ZSP.TO's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

BGIN.NEO vs. ZSP.TO - Dividend Comparison

BGIN.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than ZSP.TO's 0.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BGIN.NEO
BMO Global Innovators Fund Active ETF Series
0.19%0.30%0.36%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZSP.TO
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF
0.75%0.82%0.94%1.33%1.44%1.15%1.44%1.47%1.63%1.63%2.20%1.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


BGIN.NEO and ZSP.TO have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZSP.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZSP.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for BGIN.NEO.

BGIN.NEO is categorized as Technology Equities, while ZSP.TO is S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for BGIN.NEO and 0.09% for ZSP.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BGIN.NEO and ZSP.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer