BGIE.TO vs. ONEQ.TO
BGIE.TO (Brompton Global Infrastructure ETF) and ONEQ.TO (CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BGIE.TO returned 13.31%/yr vs 13.22%/yr for ONEQ.TO. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BGIE.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGIE.TO achieves a 12.79% return, which is significantly lower than ONEQ.TO's 14.56% return.
BGIE.TO
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -0.96%
- 6M
- 8.20%
- YTD
- 12.79%
- 1Y
- 20.19%
- 3Y*
- 21.22%
- 5Y*
- 13.31%
- 10Y*
- —
ONEQ.TO
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- 6M
- 11.89%
- YTD
- 14.56%
- 1Y
- 26.90%
- 3Y*
- 20.72%
- 5Y*
- 13.22%
- 10Y*
- 11.95%
BGIE.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGIE.TO Brompton Global Infrastructure ETF | 12.79% | 21.56% | 24.37% | 5.45% | -2.37% | 18.61% | 10.30% |
ONEQ.TO CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF | 14.56% | 17.62% | 22.45% | 19.07% | -10.74% | 21.65% | 29.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGIE.TO and ONEQ.TO is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2020 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGIE.TO vs. ONEQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BGIE.TO
ONEQ.TO
BGIE.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Global Infrastructure ETF (BGIE.TO) and CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF (ONEQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BGIE.TO | ONEQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.46 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | 4.07 | -1.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.52 | 17.98 | -10.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BGIE.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGIE.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.24%, smaller than the maximum ONEQ.TO drawdown of -34.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGIE.TO and ONEQ.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGIE.TO | ONEQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.24% | -34.40% | +16.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.35% | -6.66% | -1.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.02% | -16.08% | -0.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.24% | -17.61% | -0.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.89% | -0.68% | -3.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.43% | -3.70% | -0.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 1.51% | +1.18% |
Volatility
BGIE.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
Brompton Global Infrastructure ETF (BGIE.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.66% compared to CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF (ONEQ.TO) at 2.84%. This indicates that BGIE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ONEQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGIE.TO | ONEQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.66% | 2.84% | +0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.73% | 9.88% | +1.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.11% | 11.96% | +3.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.90% | 13.28% | +2.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.25% | 13.91% | +1.34% |
Dividends
BGIE.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
BGIE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%, more than ONEQ.TO's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGIE.TO Brompton Global Infrastructure ETF | 5.04% | 4.95% | 4.89% | 5.19% | 4.79% | 4.10% | 3.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ONEQ.TO CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF | 1.59% | 1.60% | 1.05% | 1.53% | 1.38% | 0.89% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 0.94% | 1.03% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BGIE.TO and ONEQ.TO have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Brompton and CI.
Find the right allocation for BGIE.TO and ONEQ.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer