BGHSX vs. FSHNX
BGHSX (BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund) and FSHNX (Fidelity Series High Income Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 3 years, BGHSX returned 8.07%/yr vs 10.22%/yr for FSHNX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BGHSX charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FSHNX.
Performance
BGHSX vs. FSHNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGHSX achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly lower than FSHNX's 3.33% return.
BGHSX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 0.34%
- 6M
- 0.72%
- 1Y
- 4.90%
- 3Y*
- 8.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSHNX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 3.33%
- 6M
- 4.07%
- 1Y
- 10.75%
- 3Y*
- 10.22%
- 5Y*
- 5.17%
- 10Y*
- 6.20%
BGHSX vs. FSHNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGHSX BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund | 0.34% | 5.55% | 9.90% | 13.21% | -10.23% | 1.12% |
FSHNX Fidelity Series High Income Fund | 3.33% | 11.17% | 8.75% | 11.25% | -11.52% | 2.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGHSX and FSHNX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2021 | 0.86 |
The correlation between BGHSX and FSHNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGHSX vs. FSHNX — Risk / Return Rank
BGHSX
FSHNX
BGHSX vs. FSHNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund (BGHSX) and Fidelity Series High Income Fund (FSHNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BGHSX | FSHNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.91 | -0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 5.75 | -3.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.79 | 30.13 | -22.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BGHSX | FSHNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.62 | 3.44 | -1.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.98 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 1.00 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
BGHSX vs. FSHNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGHSX drawdown since its inception was -14.30%, smaller than the maximum FSHNX drawdown of -21.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGHSX and FSHNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGHSX | FSHNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.30% | -21.98% | +7.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.67% | -2.13% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.55% | -4.05% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -21.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.24% | -2.42% | -0.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | 0.40% | +0.26% |
Volatility
BGHSX vs. FSHNX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund (BGHSX) is 0.91%, while Fidelity Series High Income Fund (FSHNX) has a volatility of 0.97%. This indicates that BGHSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSHNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGHSX | FSHNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.91% | 0.97% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.31% | 2.55% | -0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.16% | 3.55% | -0.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.48% | 5.31% | -0.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.48% | 5.83% | -1.35% |
BGHSX vs. FSHNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGHSX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than FSHNX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
BGHSX vs. FSHNX - Dividend Comparison
BGHSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.25%, less than FSHNX's 6.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGHSX BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund | 6.25% | 7.08% | 7.49% | 5.23% | 5.32% | 4.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FSHNX Fidelity Series High Income Fund | 6.96% | 7.04% | 5.97% | 6.21% | 4.90% | 5.01% | 5.57% | 6.35% | 6.95% | 6.03% | 6.24% | 5.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BGHSX and FSHNX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSHNX has higher volatility (0.97%) compared to BGHSX (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGHSX dropped -14.30% vs FSHNX's -21.98%.
FSHNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.44 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BGHSX and FSHNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer