PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BGHIX vs. HYDB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BGHIX vs. HYDB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund Class I (BGHIX) and iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF (HYDB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BGHIX vs. HYDB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BGHIX
BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund Class I
-2.08%5.53%9.77%15.16%-10.34%0.97%
HYDB
iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF
-0.64%8.10%9.11%14.02%-9.99%1.72%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGHIX achieves a -2.08% return, which is significantly lower than HYDB's -0.64% return.


BGHIX

1D
0.20%
1M
-1.70%
YTD
-2.08%
6M
-1.52%
1Y
2.86%
3Y*
8.18%
5Y*
10Y*

HYDB

1D
0.95%
1M
-1.56%
YTD
-0.64%
6M
0.62%
1Y
6.05%
3Y*
8.82%
5Y*
4.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BGHIX vs. HYDB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGHIX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than HYDB's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BGHIX vs. HYDB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGHIX
BGHIX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
BGHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
BGHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

HYDB
HYDB Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
HYDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYDB Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
HYDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYDB Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGHIX vs. HYDB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund Class I (BGHIX) and iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF (HYDB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BGHIXHYDBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.85

1.03

-0.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.22

1.48

-0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.24

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

1.28

-0.42

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.27

6.19

-2.92

BGHIX vs. HYDB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGHIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is comparable to the HYDB Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGHIX and HYDB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BGHIXHYDBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

1.03

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.69

+0.13

Correlation

The correlation between BGHIX and HYDB is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BGHIX vs. HYDB - Dividend Comparison

BGHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.40%, less than HYDB's 7.20% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BGHIX
BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund Class I
6.40%6.96%7.37%6.83%5.23%4.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HYDB
iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF
7.20%7.04%6.95%7.00%6.30%4.70%5.81%5.68%6.16%2.70%

Drawdowns

BGHIX vs. HYDB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGHIX drawdown since its inception was -14.29%, smaller than the maximum HYDB drawdown of -21.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGHIX and HYDB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BGHIXHYDBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.29%

-21.58%

+7.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.43%

-4.84%

+1.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.11%

-1.80%

-0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.24%

-2.43%

-0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

1.00%

-0.10%

Volatility

BGHIX vs. HYDB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund Class I (BGHIX) is 1.16%, while iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF (HYDB) has a volatility of 2.22%. This indicates that BGHIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYDB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BGHIXHYDBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.16%

2.22%

-1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.14%

2.91%

-0.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.85%

5.89%

-2.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.50%

7.02%

-2.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.50%

7.82%

-3.32%