BGHIX vs. FQTIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BGHIX (BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund Class I) and FQTIX (Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I) are both High Yield Bonds funds from Franklin Templeton. Over the past 3 years, BGHIX returned 8.53%/yr vs 8.69%/yr for FQTIX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BGHIX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FQTIX.

Performance

BGHIX vs. FQTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund Class I (BGHIX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGHIX achieves a 0.67% return, which is significantly lower than FQTIX's 3.55% return.

BGHIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.42%
• YTD: 0.67%
• 6M: 1.05%
• 1Y: 5.28%
• 3Y*: 8.53%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FQTIX

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 0.74%
• YTD: 3.55%
• 6M: 4.18%
• 1Y: 9.55%
• 3Y*: 8.69%
• 5Y*: 3.80%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGHIX vs. FQTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BGHIX BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund Class I	0.67%	5.53%	9.77%	15.16%	-10.34%	0.97%
FQTIX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I	3.55%	7.51%	8.03%	13.44%	-14.39%	2.56%

Correlation

The correlation between BGHIX and FQTIX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2021	0.76

The correlation between BGHIX and FQTIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BGHIX vs. FQTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGHIX

BGHIX Risk / Return Rank: 45
BGHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
BGHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
BGHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
BGHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
BGHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

FQTIX

FQTIX Risk / Return Rank: 93
FQTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
FQTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
FQTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
FQTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FQTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGHIX vs. FQTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund Class I (BGHIX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BGHIX	FQTIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.75	3.16	-1.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.17	4.79	-1.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.72	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.34	4.44	-2.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.57	23.37	-13.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BGHIX vs. FQTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGHIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is lower than the FQTIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGHIX and FQTIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BGHIX	FQTIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.75	3.16	-1.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.64	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.93	0.60	+0.33

Drawdowns

BGHIX vs. FQTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGHIX drawdown since its inception was -14.29%, smaller than the maximum FQTIX drawdown of -24.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGHIX and FQTIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BGHIX	FQTIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.29%	-24.62%	+10.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.31%	-2.20%	-0.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.66%	-6.42%	+1.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.13%	-4.32%	+1.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.56%	0.42%	+0.14%

Volatility

BGHIX vs. FQTIX - Volatility Comparison

BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund Class I (BGHIX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX) have volatilities of 0.79% and 0.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BGHIX	FQTIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.79%	0.81%	-0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.31%	2.37%	-0.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.08%	3.09%	-0.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.48%	5.94%	-1.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.48%	7.72%	-3.24%

BGHIX vs. FQTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGHIX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FQTIX's 0.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

BGHIX vs. FQTIX - Dividend Comparison

BGHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.61%, less than FQTIX's 6.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BGHIX BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund Class I	6.61%	6.96%	7.37%	6.83%	5.23%	4.66%	0.00%	0.00%
FQTIX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I	6.84%	5.70%	7.86%	7.64%	8.10%	7.15%	6.89%	5.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BGHIX and FQTIX in my portfolio?

BGHIX and FQTIX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BGHIX or FQTIX?

FQTIX has higher volatility (0.81%) compared to BGHIX (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGHIX dropped -14.29% vs FQTIX's -24.62%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FQTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.