BGGSX vs. BTLSX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

BGGSX (Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth Fund) and BTLSX (Baillie Gifford International Concentrated Growth Equities Fund) are both mutual funds - BGGSX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Baillie Gifford Funds, while BTLSX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Baillie Gifford Funds. Over the past 5 years, BGGSX returned -6.69%/yr vs -2.81%/yr for BTLSX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BGGSX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for BTLSX.

Performance

BGGSX vs. BTLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth Fund (BGGSX) and Baillie Gifford International Concentrated Growth Equities Fund (BTLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGGSX achieves a -9.23% return, which is significantly lower than BTLSX's -7.50% return.

BGGSX

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -0.15%
• YTD: -9.23%
• 6M: -11.33%
• 1Y: -9.75%
• 3Y*: 12.93%
• 5Y*: -6.69%
• 10Y*: —

BTLSX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: -7.50%
• 6M: -7.50%
• 1Y: -10.35%
• 3Y*: 8.52%
• 5Y*: -2.81%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGGSX vs. BTLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BGGSX Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth Fund	-9.23%	10.25%	30.44%	45.93%	-52.50%	-11.13%	125.42%	30.00%	8.31%	-0.59%
BTLSX Baillie Gifford International Concentrated Growth Equities Fund	-7.50%	16.56%	18.34%	14.75%	-39.64%	0.71%	100.15%	45.32%	-13.23%	-0.69%

Correlation

The correlation between BGGSX and BTLSX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2017	0.79

The correlation between BGGSX and BTLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BGGSX vs. BTLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGGSX

BGGSX Risk / Return Rank: 2
BGGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BGGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BGGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BGGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BGGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

BTLSX

BTLSX Risk / Return Rank: 1
BTLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BTLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BTLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
BTLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BTLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGGSX vs. BTLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth Fund (BGGSX) and Baillie Gifford International Concentrated Growth Equities Fund (BTLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BGGSX	BTLSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.36	-0.43	+0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.36	-0.48	+0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	0.94	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.31	-0.39	+0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.65	-0.91	+0.25

BGGSX vs. BTLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGGSX Sharpe Ratio is -0.36, which is comparable to the BTLSX Sharpe Ratio of -0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGGSX and BTLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BGGSX vs. BTLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGGSX drawdown since its inception was -68.76%, which is greater than BTLSX's maximum drawdown of -56.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGGSX and BTLSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BGGSX	BTLSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.76%	-56.26%	-12.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.08%	-21.66%	-4.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.87%	-25.32%	-5.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-67.71%	-55.86%	-11.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.65%	-24.08%	-9.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.20%	-20.64%	-4.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.41%	9.35%	+3.06%

Volatility

BGGSX vs. BTLSX - Volatility Comparison

Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth Fund (BGGSX) has a higher volatility of 8.50% compared to Baillie Gifford International Concentrated Growth Equities Fund (BTLSX) at 3.86%. This indicates that BGGSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BGGSX	BTLSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.50%	3.86%	+4.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.33%	15.70%	+1.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.39%	20.01%	+2.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.25%	29.12%	+6.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.16%	28.38%	+3.78%

BGGSX vs. BTLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGGSX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BTLSX's 0.81% expense ratio.

Dividends

BGGSX vs. BTLSX - Dividend Comparison

Neither BGGSX nor BTLSX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BGGSX Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	16.38%	2.61%	3.29%	1.35%	2.02%
BTLSX Baillie Gifford International Concentrated Growth Equities Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	6.18%	25.27%	102.72%	0.17%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BGGSX and BTLSX in my portfolio?

BGGSX and BTLSX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BGGSX or BTLSX?

BGGSX has higher volatility (8.50%) compared to BTLSX (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGGSX dropped -68.76% vs BTLSX's -56.26%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BGGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.36 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.