BGGSX vs. BLUEX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BGGSX (Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth Fund) and BLUEX (AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, BGGSX returned -3.41%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for BLUEX. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BGGSX charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for BLUEX.

Performance

BGGSX vs. BLUEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth Fund (BGGSX) and AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGGSX achieves a -4.80% return, which is significantly higher than BLUEX's -6.58% return.

BGGSX

• 1D: -1.77%
• 1M: 4.13%
• YTD: -4.80%
• 6M: -7.13%
• 1Y: -1.10%
• 3Y*: 15.80%
• 5Y*: -3.41%
• 10Y*: —

BLUEX

• 1D: -1.34%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: -6.58%
• 6M: -6.15%
• 1Y: -6.22%
• 3Y*: 3.42%
• 5Y*: 0.30%
• 10Y*: 9.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGGSX vs. BLUEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BGGSX Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth Fund	-4.80%	10.25%	30.44%	45.93%	-52.50%	-11.13%	125.42%	30.00%	8.31%	16.54%
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund	-6.58%	4.45%	7.24%	14.35%	-14.30%	3.22%	34.74%	35.34%	-4.91%	15.94%

Correlation

The correlation between BGGSX and BLUEX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2017	0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between BGGSX and BLUEX has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

BGGSX vs. BLUEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGGSX

BGGSX Risk / Return Rank: 3
BGGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
BGGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
BGGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
BGGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BGGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

BLUEX

BLUEX Risk / Return Rank: 1
BLUEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BLUEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BLUEX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
BLUEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BLUEX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGGSX vs. BLUEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth Fund (BGGSX) and AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BGGSX	BLUEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.03	-0.67	+0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.11	-0.88	+0.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	0.90	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.02	-0.55	+0.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.05	-1.37	+1.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BGGSX vs. BLUEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGGSX Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is higher than the BLUEX Sharpe Ratio of -0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGGSX and BLUEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BGGSX	BLUEX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03	-0.67	+0.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.10	0.03	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.57	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	0.49	-0.08

Drawdowns

BGGSX vs. BLUEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGGSX drawdown since its inception was -68.76%, which is greater than BLUEX's maximum drawdown of -54.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGGSX and BLUEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BGGSX	BLUEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.76%	-54.27%	-14.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.08%	-12.19%	-13.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.87%	-12.19%	-18.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-67.71%	-21.87%	-45.84%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-29.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.41%	-8.53%	-21.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.16%	-13.37%	-11.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.77%	4.85%	+6.92%

Volatility

BGGSX vs. BLUEX - Volatility Comparison

Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth Fund (BGGSX) has a higher volatility of 5.60% compared to AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) at 3.48%. This indicates that BGGSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLUEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BGGSX	BLUEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.60%	3.48%	+2.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.03%	7.75%	+8.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.43%	9.98%	+11.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.17%	10.62%	+24.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.17%	16.59%	+15.58%

BGGSX vs. BLUEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGGSX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BLUEX's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

BGGSX vs. BLUEX - Dividend Comparison

BGGSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BLUEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BGGSX Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	16.38%	2.61%	3.29%	1.35%	2.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund	0.33%	0.31%	0.29%	0.03%	11.84%	27.20%	25.43%	13.71%	13.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BGGSX and BLUEX in my portfolio?

BGGSX and BLUEX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BGGSX or BLUEX?

BGGSX has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to BLUEX (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGGSX dropped -68.76% vs BLUEX's -54.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BGGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.03 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.