BGGSX vs. AMRGX
BGGSX (Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth Fund) and AMRGX (American Growth Fund Series One) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, BGGSX returned -3.41%/yr vs 10.60%/yr for AMRGX. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BGGSX charges 0.75%/yr vs 4.07%/yr for AMRGX.
Performance
BGGSX vs. AMRGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGGSX achieves a -4.80% return, which is significantly lower than AMRGX's 18.37% return.
BGGSX
- 1D
- -1.77%
- 1M
- 4.13%
- YTD
- -4.80%
- 6M
- -7.13%
- 1Y
- -1.10%
- 3Y*
- 15.80%
- 5Y*
- -3.41%
- 10Y*
- —
AMRGX
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- 7.84%
- YTD
- 18.37%
- 6M
- 16.83%
- 1Y
- 37.84%
- 3Y*
- 19.51%
- 5Y*
- 10.60%
- 10Y*
- 12.23%
BGGSX vs. AMRGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGGSX Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth Fund | -4.80% | 10.25% | 30.44% | 45.93% | -52.50% | -11.13% | 125.42% | 30.00% | 8.31% | 16.54% |
AMRGX American Growth Fund Series One | 18.37% | 11.18% | 16.61% | 24.38% | -19.93% | 15.64% | 18.65% | 36.73% | -9.07% | 5.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGGSX and AMRGX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2017 | 0.67 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BGGSX and AMRGX has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGGSX vs. AMRGX — Risk / Return Rank
BGGSX
AMRGX
BGGSX vs. AMRGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth Fund (BGGSX) and American Growth Fund Series One (AMRGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BGGSX | AMRGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.39 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | 2.83 | -2.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.05 | 6.90 | -6.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BGGSX | AMRGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 | 1.47 | -1.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | 0.48 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.12 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
BGGSX vs. AMRGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGGSX drawdown since its inception was -68.76%, smaller than the maximum AMRGX drawdown of -80.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGGSX and AMRGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGGSX | AMRGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.76% | -80.32% | +11.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.08% | -13.98% | -12.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.87% | -21.15% | -9.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.71% | -35.42% | -32.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.41% | 0.00% | -30.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.16% | -40.25% | +15.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.77% | 5.66% | +6.11% |
Volatility
BGGSX vs. AMRGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth Fund (BGGSX) is 5.60%, while American Growth Fund Series One (AMRGX) has a volatility of 6.47%. This indicates that BGGSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMRGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGGSX | AMRGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.60% | 6.47% | -0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.03% | 24.98% | -8.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.43% | 26.89% | -5.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.17% | 22.21% | +12.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.17% | 21.50% | +10.67% |
BGGSX vs. AMRGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGGSX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than AMRGX's 4.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
BGGSX vs. AMRGX - Dividend Comparison
BGGSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMRGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.06%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMRGX American Growth Fund Series One | 15.06% | 17.82% | 12.39% | 8.17% | 7.77% | 12.21% | 2.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BGGSX Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 16.38% | 2.61% | 3.29% | 1.35% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BGGSX and AMRGX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMRGX has higher volatility (6.47%) compared to BGGSX (5.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGGSX dropped -68.76% vs AMRGX's -80.32%.
AMRGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BGGSX and AMRGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer