BGGSX vs. ACIHX
BGGSX (Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth Fund) and ACIHX (American Century Growth Fund G Class) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, BGGSX returned 12.93%/yr vs 19.72%/yr for ACIHX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BGGSX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for ACIHX.
Performance
BGGSX vs. ACIHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGGSX achieves a -9.23% return, which is significantly lower than ACIHX's 1.80% return.
BGGSX
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- -9.23%
- 6M
- -11.33%
- 1Y
- -9.75%
- 3Y*
- 12.93%
- 5Y*
- -6.69%
- 10Y*
- —
ACIHX
- 1D
- -1.70%
- 1M
- -3.26%
- YTD
- 1.80%
- 6M
- 0.44%
- 1Y
- 16.74%
- 3Y*
- 19.72%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BGGSX vs. ACIHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGGSX Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth Fund | -9.23% | 10.25% | 30.44% | 45.93% | -6.71% |
ACIHX American Century Growth Fund G Class | 1.80% | 16.26% | 27.35% | 44.64% | -6.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGGSX and ACIHX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2022 | 0.82 |
The correlation between BGGSX and ACIHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGGSX vs. ACIHX — Risk / Return Rank
BGGSX
ACIHX
BGGSX vs. ACIHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth Fund (BGGSX) and American Century Growth Fund G Class (ACIHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BGGSX | ACIHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.20 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.31 | 1.14 | -1.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.65 | 3.71 | -4.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BGGSX vs. ACIHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGGSX drawdown since its inception was -68.76%, which is greater than ACIHX's maximum drawdown of -24.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGGSX and ACIHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGGSX | ACIHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.76% | -24.00% | -44.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.08% | -16.40% | -9.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.87% | -24.00% | -6.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.65% | -7.04% | -26.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.20% | -4.88% | -20.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.41% | 5.01% | +7.40% |
Volatility
BGGSX vs. ACIHX - Volatility Comparison
Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth Fund (BGGSX) has a higher volatility of 8.50% compared to American Century Growth Fund G Class (ACIHX) at 6.58%. This indicates that BGGSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACIHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGGSX | ACIHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.50% | 6.58% | +1.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.33% | 13.06% | +4.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.39% | 16.67% | +5.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.25% | 21.12% | +14.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.16% | 21.12% | +11.04% |
BGGSX vs. ACIHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGGSX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ACIHX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
BGGSX vs. ACIHX - Dividend Comparison
BGGSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACIHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.67%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACIHX American Century Growth Fund G Class | 15.67% | 15.95% | 5.65% | 4.61% | 2.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BGGSX Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 16.38% | 2.61% | 3.29% | 1.35% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BGGSX and ACIHX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BGGSX has higher volatility (8.50%) compared to ACIHX (6.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGGSX dropped -68.76% vs ACIHX's -24.00%.
ACIHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BGGSX and ACIHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer