BGFIX vs. WSMDX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BGFIX (William Blair Growth Fund) and WSMDX (William Blair Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - BGFIX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 3000® Growth Index, while WSMDX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by William Blair. Over the past 10 years, BGFIX returned 15.44%/yr vs 13.02%/yr for WSMDX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BGFIX charges 0.89%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for WSMDX.

Performance

BGFIX vs. WSMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in William Blair Growth Fund (BGFIX) and William Blair Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund (WSMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGFIX achieves a 6.04% return, which is significantly lower than WSMDX's 14.00% return. Over the past 10 years, BGFIX has outperformed WSMDX with an annualized return of 15.44%, while WSMDX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.02% annualized return.

BGFIX

• 1D: -1.03%
• 1M: 0.43%
• YTD: 6.04%
• 6M: 4.99%
• 1Y: 18.47%
• 3Y*: 17.02%
• 5Y*: 8.65%
• 10Y*: 15.44%

WSMDX

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 3.85%
• YTD: 14.00%
• 6M: 11.72%
• 1Y: 25.21%
• 3Y*: 17.10%
• 5Y*: 5.97%
• 10Y*: 13.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGFIX vs. WSMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BGFIX William Blair Growth Fund	6.04%	10.83%	22.26%	38.13%	-29.60%	22.24%	36.48%	32.43%	5.25%	24.53%
WSMDX William Blair Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund	14.00%	0.63%	27.55%	18.14%	-22.98%	8.28%	32.38%	30.81%	-2.18%	28.85%

Correlation

The correlation between BGFIX and WSMDX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2003	0.91

The correlation between BGFIX and WSMDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BGFIX vs. WSMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGFIX

BGFIX Risk / Return Rank: 15
BGFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
BGFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
BGFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
BGFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
BGFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

WSMDX

WSMDX Risk / Return Rank: 33
WSMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
WSMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
WSMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
WSMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
WSMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGFIX vs. WSMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for William Blair Growth Fund (BGFIX) and William Blair Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund (WSMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BGFIX	WSMDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.11	1.42	-0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.58	2.04	-0.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.25	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.99	2.35	-1.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.81	8.57	-5.77

BGFIX vs. WSMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is comparable to the WSMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGFIX and WSMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BGFIX vs. WSMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGFIX drawdown since its inception was -53.45%, which is greater than WSMDX's maximum drawdown of -50.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGFIX and WSMDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BGFIX	WSMDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.45%	-50.33%	-3.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.83%	-11.50%	-8.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.34%	-25.63%	+0.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.70%	-36.89%	+0.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.70%	-36.89%	+0.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.30%	0.00%	-4.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.39%	-8.45%	-4.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.99%	3.15%	+3.84%

Volatility

BGFIX vs. WSMDX - Volatility Comparison

William Blair Growth Fund (BGFIX) has a higher volatility of 7.00% compared to William Blair Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund (WSMDX) at 6.45%. This indicates that BGFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WSMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BGFIX	WSMDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.00%	6.45%	+0.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.89%	15.03%	-1.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.71%	19.05%	-1.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.67%	23.16%	-1.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.65%	22.00%	-1.35%

BGFIX vs. WSMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGFIX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than WSMDX's 1.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

BGFIX vs. WSMDX - Dividend Comparison

BGFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.44%, more than WSMDX's 2.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BGFIX William Blair Growth Fund	25.44%	26.97%	24.13%	9.67%	3.60%	11.74%	12.31%	8.62%	33.23%	34.05%	8.35%	12.91%
WSMDX William Blair Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund	2.46%	2.81%	24.90%	7.89%	3.34%	9.30%	1.66%	7.13%	8.88%	5.33%	2.64%	5.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BGFIX and WSMDX in my portfolio?

BGFIX and WSMDX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BGFIX or WSMDX?

BGFIX has higher volatility (7.00%) compared to WSMDX (6.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGFIX dropped -53.45% vs WSMDX's -50.33%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WSMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.